Talk:Tøger Seidenfaden

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

Portal	Tøger Seidenfaden falls within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a project to create and improve Denmark-related Wikipedia articles. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, all interested editors are welcome!
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale. (FAQ). (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] please : do not censor factually correct information !

How is it against any WIKI-rules to state provable facts about a living person ? please, DO NOT delete relevant information . For instance it is imperative for the correct understanding of the so-called "Muhammed cartoon crisis" that people know,understand, and have access to, information about the affiliations of the involved parties . 83.233.182.187 (talk) 15:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

The policy Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons requires that contentious material on living people must be cited to reliable sources. In your first version, the statement about the newspaper never reporting on the meetings was a violation of this as it had no source at all. The use of the global-elite.org-site as a reference is also not acceptable — self-published websites don't meet the criteria, and as far as I can tell the bilderberg.org-site has the same problem.
The reply from "ask politiken", you mentioned on my talk page is interesting and if they have printed it on their website, we can certainly use that? The bottom line is that the criteria for inclusion of information is verifiability, not truth. Hemmingsen 17:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)