User talk:Szac

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Notability of Angelo Rocca

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Angelo Rocca, by Cbdorsett, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Angelo Rocca seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Angelo Rocca, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Angelo Rocca itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Glagolitic alphabet

I inserted some {facts} to your edits. I know that it is less than week, but if you have it insert a refersnces, Thanks. Szac 03:11, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

i will look:Nasz 03:44, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not be offended by the deletion of your contributions by myself and other editors. Allow me to explain.

I appreciate your efforts to make this page more comprehensive and interesting. However, Wikipedia has some strict policies about new additions. First of all, what you add must have a citation. For example, you put in something about the Polish meaning of 'talking faces'. This could just be an accident of language, or it could be a theory that is actually published by a reputable scholar. If a scholar wrote about it, and thinks it is likely, then we need a proper source to the book. It does not matter what language the source is in.

I removed your image because it did not conform to Wikipedia policies. Please see what I wrote on the article's talk page. I like the image and would like to see it in the article. There is a specific method to upload images, which includes statement of (1) the fact that the book is in the public domain, and (2) that the photographer who created the image licenses it to Wikipedia under the terms of the GNU agreement. There is also a particular way to link to the photo once it has been uploaded.

What you wrote about Benedykt Chmielowski seems interesting, and it may even be relevant. However, I had a hard time understanding what you are trying to say. Even more important, there was no citation. Which book of Chmielowski was this stuff found in? What page? When and where was the book published?

I really don't think we need Rocca's book in here. We all agree that the alphabet came from Kyril and Methodius. Now we know that 12th-century Croatian scribes thought Jerome created it, and that this legend persisted as late as 1812. Why do we need a listing of medieval books that perpetuated the now-discredited myth?

I would like to know more about the ligatures. Can you provide enough previously-published information to fill a paragraph? Is there a public-domain collection of ligatures we can upload as an image? Did the Kazakhs really use Glagolitic letters? If so, that's very interesting, and we need not only a cite but an image from one of the 17th-century documents you mentioned. If Glagolitic was preferred for legal documents, which country did this apply to? Is there a published citation that supports this assertion. Again, I think it is terribly interesting, and very relevant to the article.

If you can provide the backbone - the basic data, I will be very happy to help you with the English. When we are finished, maybe you can translate the article back into your native language (Polish?) and contribute it to the appropriate foreign-language Wikipedia. Cbdorsett 08:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

a lot of words. But why you wanted to delete my first art? [1] Lokking at your edition i see you have small hard drive, hart and hed. I do not apreciate more talk with person like you. ok! Szac 10:04, 31 May 2007 (UTC)