User talk:SynergeticMaggot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 This user talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Sections older than 7 days will be archived.
Section age is determined by the latest timestamp in the individual sections; any section with no timestamps will not be archived by the bot. All sections archived from this page are listed here. This page's archives are split by size. When an archive reaches 256kb, a new archive is created. The current archive is Archive 4. A list of all archives can be found here.
Archive
Archives
List of all archived sections

I am currently:



[edit] WP:BAG MFD

Plenty of people want this open, there is ongoing discussion, and there are comments after the close that I need to respond to. Would you consider unclosing it? Gimmetrow 08:20, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

  • SM, please see what I wrote here. If the discussion remains closed, could you at least not use reversion tools to remove post-closure comments. Those should be allowed for a while, or moved to the talk page. I think that some centralised discussion, linked by a prominent tag at WP:BAG is needed. The MfD did succeed in attracting attention (sometimes difficult with bot policy), though the look of the MfD tag does prejudice some people, and the MfD was essentially turning into a centralised discussion, regardless of whether it was the right venue or not. Carcharoth (talk) 08:36, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
I'll check it out, but first I'll respond, as I've responded on Gimmetrow's talk. I used restore only, with a kind response, I feel its entirely appropriate. Although the MfD attracted attention, it was only due to the sudden cry of Speedy keep. I think a cent discussion should be a link to a talk page, and not an MfD though. I'll check on your comments now. :) — MaggotSyn 08:40, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk page notices have not got enough people involved. I think as this is a Wikipedia namespace page, a notice on the page itself announcing a discussion is entirely appropriate. Limiting notices to talk pages is really only done for articles, with the exception of deletion notices and clean-up tags. Carcharoth (talk) 08:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
I think I beat you to that. I edit conflicted with another editor. :) — MaggotSyn 08:48, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Looking back, I think you misunderstood. What I meant was, the centralized discussion link should be to a talk page, not a link to the MfD (which would be less appropriate). — MaggotSyn 08:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bottom template of Certified RfA.

Thanks for doing that, temporary mind slip. Cheers, -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 05:42, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] My Rfa

Thanks, SynergeticMaggot, for participating in my recent RfA, which recently passed with 81 support and 1 neutral !votes. I appreciate all the support and constructive criticism offered in my RfA and I thank you for taking the time to !vote in my nomination. I feel so honoured to be trusted by so many of you and please, if you have any advice, comments or complaints about my actions as an administrator, leave a note on my talk page.

I would also like to thank Acalamari, Rlevse and Nishkid64, for their nomination statements.
Thank you again.
AngelOfSadness talk 23:31, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
  • No worries Syn, thanks for dropping by my talk page after-the-fact. =) xenocidic (talk) 14:57, 10 June 2008 (UTC)