Talk:Synergetics coordinates
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Notation
Can the notation Rn+∪0 be made clear? Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 06:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- R means the real number set; n is the dimension; + means positive numbers, and ∪0 means that set in union with 0, so it is the set {positive real numbers and 0} in n dimensions. If one has studied mathematical logic the notation should be clear; many other math articles use mathematical logic statements. But, if you think explanation should go in the article, feel free to add it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dchmelik (talk • contribs) 02:52, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- The notation I am familiar with is (the plus is down) Is this what you mean? Also, is not equivalent to Rn − 1, they have different dimensions. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:47, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- In all my college math books & courses I have seen the positive subset to be noted with a superscript plus, but if notation varies around the world let us change the article. Reconsider your 2nd statement. R2 is 2-dimensional reals, and can mean 2 axes, but 3 R+∪0 axes separated 120° is R2-space: i.e. it (R3+∪0) is equivalent to R2, and the coordinates can be converted (one persona has called the synergetics coordinates ' polysign numbers;' their web page likely has explanation.)--Dchmelik (talk) 07:44, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- What you say about 120° is R2-space is not clear from the article, in fact I still don't understand what the article is about, and what you mean by synergetics coordinates. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:23, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- In all my college math books & courses I have seen the positive subset to be noted with a superscript plus, but if notation varies around the world let us change the article. Reconsider your 2nd statement. R2 is 2-dimensional reals, and can mean 2 axes, but 3 R+∪0 axes separated 120° is R2-space: i.e. it (R3+∪0) is equivalent to R2, and the coordinates can be converted (one persona has called the synergetics coordinates ' polysign numbers;' their web page likely has explanation.)--Dchmelik (talk) 07:44, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
-