From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics. |
Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
??? |
This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics. |
Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
|
|
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Physics because it uses a stub template.
- If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
- If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Physics}} template, removing {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
|
[edit] Replacement of the cyclotron
Synchrocycltrons have been built, unfortunately, the only reference for this I have is a course material written in French by a CERN collaborator.
See also McMillan, Edwin Mattison —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.194.8.73 (talk • contribs) on 22:00, 26 September 2005
It seems that Synchrotron are what replaced the Synchrocyclotron. See [1]. Dlenmn 02:34, 15 November 2005 (UTC)