Talk:Symphony No. 2 (Tchaikovsky)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Symphony No. 2 (Tchaikovsky) article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Symphony No. 2 (Tchaikovsky) is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, cleanup, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that aren't covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
	This article is supported by the Compositions task force.

[edit] A start

Note that this article was copied from the French wikipedia. It will need minor translation. -- A. Wang ^{(talk/contrb.)} 17:00, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

The expansion should discuss the movements of the symphony primarily. It may talk about the history of the symphony, the composer's state when he wrote it, more about the form and composition of this piece. -- A. Wang ^{(talk/contrb.)} 22:45, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Revert on major insertion of material by Jonyungk

I have reverted some of Jonyungk's edits following their recent insertion of a significant amount of material (originally in a section titled "Folk song versus symphonic development") that I subsequently tagged as an essay.

I don't know what their intention was, but their subsequent edits removed my tag, and integrated the new section into the main text of the article, with no section header. This has the effect, intentional or not, of disguising their edits. Please discuss your material here. I don't think it's defensible in its current form, with no references whatsoever, and what seem like subjective opinions. +ILike2BeAnonymous 18:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC)