Talk:Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (nations and regions): Korean cinema task force

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea (Film), a project to build and improve articles related to Korea. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion.
	Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Please help us improve this article.
	???	This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Wiki Words

I don't think such common words as capitalist, torture, black market, anesthesia and electricity need to be wikified. Everybody knows what they means and the linked articles won't really help someone understand the movie. Only relevant links, which will really enhance a reader's understanding, should be linked. For example not everybody will understand the significance of cutting a person's Achilles tendon, so that was a good link. I think in a plot description it is very distracting to see links.--ThreeAnswers 22:46, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

• I think the re-linking I did is sufficiently minimal so that it does not hinder the reading of the article, and feel that they do enhance the article to a small degree. In response to your statement that "Only relevant links, which will really enhance a reader's understanding, should be linked":

1. Firstly, this is a guideline, not a "rule".
2. It's not like every other word in the article is linked - in a Plot section of about 470 words, only 8 are linked. I don't believe this makes it any harder to read whatsoever.
3. Although the words are relatively common, it is conceivable that readers may not fully understand terms like capitalist or black market. I suspect more people actually understand the nature of Achilles tendons than understand the nature of capitalism.
4. If you were to describe the film to someone, you would almost certainly use terms like torture and black market. These are decent articles with a plenty of info beyond dictionary definitions.

What to link is a judgement call, and I made mine by reinstating a reduced number of those links you had removed. I agreed that I initially overwikified, and after reading the guidelines I still felt it was appropriate to have some of those links.

We could argue about the relative merits of each link - e.g. I certainly think polemic should be linked, but although Electricty is a piped link to Electric shock, I concede that it could be simply re-worded in the article rather than being linked. I understand your point of view, but ultimately, I have no desire to go back and forth with this. In my opinion it's not an important enough issue for us to seek consensus from the other wikipedians. If you really want to unlink them, do what you feel is best. Gram 10:40, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

• • Perhaps someone could write a bit about the plot and involves important moral and class struggle undertones? Just a thought. I think having only the plot is a little weak, or maybe have a sypnosis or something that someone can read without spoiling the movie for themselves.

[edit] Incorrect Plot Summary

Has anyone noticed that the plot summary is glaringly incorrect? Ryu does not kidnap his own boss's daughter, as he explains to Cha Yeong-mi, they would immediately come looking for him. They kidnap the daughter of his boss's friend, Park Dong-jin.

• I altered the original text as little as possible, just to correct the plot errors without making a complete rewrite. Also, I removed the word "polemic" from the final paragraph, it was a very awkward use and the connotation was wrong.

[edit] Improvements - More Critical Reviews

I've started on some references but the "Reception" section needs much more work. More critical reviews and analysis of the movie by critics will flesh out the article.

Also any information on the production of the movie? e.g. how long it took to shoot, edit etc. Stextc (talk) 10:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)