Talk:Symmetry of second derivatives
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I think it would help, for the counterexample, to check whether it is locally integrable, at (0,0). Charles Matthews 22:39, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
I'm very curious, as I know this property as "Young's Theorem," but this is not mentioned by name here. (dphrag 07:19, 14 June 2006 (UTC))
- Yeah, I also heard it is called that way. I mentioned this in the article. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 01:01, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Copied out from article
[Could someone write up such an example here or in its own article, and add that to the list of mathematical examples?]
I removed it. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 (T | C | @) 21:48, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merger
Definitely agree that this should be merged with Clairaut's theorem. --Macrakis 01:33, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Agree. -- Hongooi 17:51, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Counterexample:
How is the given function a counterexample? The article asserts that "Then the mixed partial derivatives of f exist, and are continuous everywhere except at (0,0)".
However, (0,0) is not in the domain of the original function. -- Heath 24.127.115.128 15:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- I tried to make that clearer. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:21, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Counterexample Again
I worked through the second partial derivatives of the counterexample and they seem to be equal; i.e., the "counterexample" isn't a counterexample. I got and my TI-89 confirmed it. Comments? Jonah 02:03, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- The counterexample is correct:
- let
- You may also want to check, that (it results from basic limits).
- Now:
- Mkalinowski (talk) 20:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)