User talk:Swirlface

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I've just got back from an extended weekend (which was great btw) and have found myself blocked. If this has anything to do with my newly acquired username I am more than happy to change it again, should this one also be deemed offensive"

Decline reason: "It seems you have actually been blocked for sockpuppetry. I'll ask the blocking admin to comment. - auburnpilot talk 01:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Ah, I see this is a somewhat more serious allegation :( I do use a shared IP which has seen a few blocks as of late so I guess this sort of thing is unsurprising. I hope my contributions can convince you that I am nothing to do with this idiocy "

Decline reason: "Per[1]. Please contact the arbcom if you wish to dispute the accuracy of Jpgordon's findings. MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 09:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "To be honest, I'm not even going to dispute the findings, as it's extremely likely that a sockpuppeteer is sharing my IP, given its illustrious history of editing. I am disputing that the said sockpuppeteer is me. More to the point, even if I do have to start again and create a new account, how can I be sure that I won't get caught up in this sort of thing again. Incidentally, how do I contact the arbcom now that I'm blocked? I'd prefer not to register an email address is possible (ie if someone could post a request on my behalf), but of course if there is no other way then I shall."

Decline reason: "Per Rlevse below, let's let ArbCom sort this out. -MBK₀₀₄ 11:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Has anyone got in touch with the arbcom yet? If it's just a case of my being impatient, by all means ignore me! :)"

Decline reason: "Question asked, question answered. Please contact an arbitrator directly to contest this block. You can find their contacts on WP:ARBCOM — Spartaz ^Humbug! 13:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.