User talk:Swial
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] April 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Evolution/draft article, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Evolution/draft article was changed by Swial (u) (t) score equals -2035 on 2008-04-08T20:14:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:15, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Dude are you mentally ill? Come on, you can tell me. I'm just curious to know if you're a vandal/prankster or if you're really mental. I won't tell anyone. So...Taking any meds? Angry Christian (talk) 20:18, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
I have never taken any medication for mental illness and have never been diagnosed / sectioned etc. as such, but that doesn't prove I'm not. I hate Wikipedia and what it stands for ie. truth by consensus. I don't consider myself mental; just persistent.Swial (talk) 20:23, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
why don't you try and make it better instead of vandalizing. What you do turns people away from God--Adamfinmo (talk) 05:29, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Because "I hate Wikipedia and what it stands for ie. truth by consensus". I believe in truth by authority ie. not allowing just anybody to amend an encyclopedia. What I do doesn't turn people away from God. It makes life harder for the administrators and other editors here and (currently) stops random people from editing Evolution; their contributions are checked by an administrator first.Swial (talk) 12:49, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Oh I see now. I thought the Genesis Vandal was a religious person. I think you have it wrong about us. We don't believe in truth by consensus, we believe in content by consensus.--Adamfinmo (talk) 19:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
I am a religious person hence my choice of target article and text used. Since Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopedia, content is supposed to be truth.Swial (talk) 22:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Then help us out. You can't win every battle WP isn't perfect, but what you are doing is destructive. Why don't you and I take a look at the articles for Intelligent Design and Creationism and see if we can do something good and helpful there?--Adamfinmo (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
No. I disagree with the basic concepts of a freely-editable encyclopedia and truth / content by consensus. I edit Wikipedia when and how I feel like it, normally in a deliberately disruptive manner.Swial (talk) 20:16, 13 April 2008 (UTC)