User talk:Swampfire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is not a Sock puppet account I forgot the password to Bleu_Bayou and could get no help at getting into it, so I created this one. Any admin that reads this please close the account named Bleu_Bayou as I will not be using it anymore.Swampfire (talk) 18:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

I confirm what this user is saying; the relevant CHU request where this has been discussed is here. -Jéské (v^_^v Detarder) 18:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Side note

Is it alright if I redirected the Bleu_Bayou pages to these, or would you prefer I not do so? -Jéské (v^_^v Detarder) 18:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Sure, Thanks for all your helpSwampfire (talk) 19:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Done, and null perspiration, chummer. -Jéské (v^_^v Detarder) 18:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Susan Tedeschi

Rock and Roll has its stylistic origins in blues, but that does not neccessarily make blues into rock music. If you do not believe me, see the article for Blues. I removed Tedeschi because her article infobox describes her as a blues and soul singer, not a rock singer, and the fact that HER OWN WEBSITE describes her as a blues/soul singer. I am not trying to be difficult, I merely go by what the article about an individual says. Asarelah (talk) 23:15, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Please do not take such an angry tone with me. I am trying to be reasonable with you. You did not address the points that I made in my previous post, such as the fact that her website does not use the word "rock" to describe her music, and also the information in the article about blues. I would certainly not delete the other acts that you mentioned, as they not only performed blues, but rock and blues-rock. Please address the points that I made instead of attacking me personally and accusing me of trying to own the article, it gets us nowhere. Asarelah (talk) 16:00, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
We obviously have reached an impasse here. Perhaps the best thing to do would be to list the talk page of Susan Tedeschi under "requests for comment", and thus get more editors opinions on the matter. Sound reasonable? Asarelah (talk) 16:51, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean by "The only RFC that should be placed there. . Is on the basis for including people." Do you mean that we should put the RFC on the talk page of the list itself rather than on her article talk page? Asarelah (talk) 17:44, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Stop edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Native Americans in the United States. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. . I've started a thread on the list of related ethnic groups in the infobox at talk:Native Americans in the United States#Related ethnic groups, please discuss this issue there rather than continuing to revert to your preferred version. And, note that in the version you've restored "Alaskan Natives" is misspelled. -- Rick Block (talk) 04:45, 9 June 2008 (UTC)