User talk:Swainstonation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Academic Challenger 03:53, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Don't remove other people's comments from talk pages. Pcb21 Pete 06:46, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
To join the counter vandalism unit. Go to my user page and click the link in the Counter-Vandalism unit box. There'll be instructions there. St jimmy 09:41, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Note
Replied to your note on my Talk page. --Mr. Billion 03:46, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] I do reallize.
Yes I do know that quite well. Why do you ask? (Actually it technically does exist in my mind, but not the physical world.) The Wookieepedian 23:18, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
then its not real, it doesnt exist, things in ur imagination dont exist
- It depends on what you define as "real." See reality. The Wookieepedian 23:27, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
i persieve reality as something tangible and actually there, satr wars is neither
- So you define real as only objects and actions that you observe with your senses? I define real as anything you observe or imagine. Physical or not, both exist as images in your mind. The Wookieepedian 23:32, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
if other people can see or feel it to its real, and thank god i cant see ur imagination, i cant see ur imagination its not real
- Not real to you, that is. BTW, in response to you comment on my user page, I hate the south. I'm not your typical southern person. The Wookieepedian 00:00, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
not real to me or anybody
-
-
- right ur obsessed with star wars, whilst southern people have real lives
-
-
-
-
- We all have our illusions, buddy. Some are just lucky enough to reallize this. We all have our opiums. Controlling them, like I do with Star Wars, is the fun part. Most don't even reallize they're under certain illusions in life. The Wookieepedian 13:08, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- illusions arent real
-
-
-
-
-
-
- What is real? Be careful now... The Wookieepedian 22:39, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- gases, liquids, and solids: matter--Andy 23:09, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
And plasma, and the functions that those solids, liquids, gases, and plasma make. By the way, stop your crap over at Wookieepedia. You're making yourself look like an idiot. The Wookieepedian 23:24, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- how, by making fun of the dorks at wookieepedia, what thay makes is a solids, liquids, gases, or plasma, and thats included in the group
-
-
-
-
- Who's the bigger dork? The dork, or the dork who follows them? The Wookieepedian 05:02, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- that doesnt make sense, i dont follow them, i make fun of them--Andy 20:29, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- So who's the bigger dork? Is it the guy who signs up on Wookieepedia with the purpose of contributing, or a guy who signs up with the purpose of causing problems for those who contribute? The Wookieepedian 21:34, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- the first one--Andy 21:35, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- ... The Wookieepedian 22:07, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- what--Andy 00:10, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- uhh...spahgetti...or something. andy he called it dude. -howie
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Andy's sucking his own right now.
-
-
-
-
-
[edit] Three-revert rule on Talk:Wookieepedia
Hello. You have violated Wikipedia:Three-revert rule on Talk:Wookieepedia. It seems to be the consensus among editors (including myself) that the material you're trying to include on that page is inappropriate. If you disagree and feel it should be included, please make your case on Talk:Wookieepedia and we'll see if we can all reach an agreement or a compromise without any further reverting. --P3d0 16:34, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Request for comment
I have opened a request for comment on your recent behaviour. — ceejayoz talk 05:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- Please read the page and put your response in the proper location, that being under "Response". The instructions are quite clear. — ceejayoz talk 23:24, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hey
I tried to saved your ass on your request for coment page, so when the time comes you better help me with a problem.--70.112.158.200 16:20, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
sure, but y did u leave the comment outside ur username--The Nation 16:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Uh.. it's quite obvious that you two are the same person. Evil saltine 23:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
24.175.122.79,
24.175.124.134 are my ip adresses, its my friends ip address--The Nation 00:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
im sorry, im new here and i forgot to login--TheBeneFielder123 00:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- Alright, sorry for rushing to judgement. Evil saltine 04:55, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Its Okay.--TheNation 18:06, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Conservative_notice_board
Hello, I noticed that you identify as a conservative Wikipedian. So I would like to invite you to post any conservative issues you might have over at the new project page, Wikipedia:Conservative_notice_board. Thanks. --Facto 05:22, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your user page
This edit served to remove a dynamic link to a template and replace it with the static version. Hipocrite - «Talk» 19:41, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your message
I responded on my talk page. -- Where is Where? 21:49, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] My RfA
Hello Swainstonation, and thanks for voting in my recent RfA, which passed with a tally of (68/19/3). I appreciated your comments, which I hope to take on board in order to gain your respect in my work as an administrator. Best of luck in your continued editing of the encyclopedia! Sam Vimes 17:50, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] "personal attacks"
Saw III is filled with vandalism day in and day out. I'm sick and tired of it. If they're not going to show personal courtesty to me I don't see why I should show them any. And furthermore, I'd like to know why you reprimanded me but not her for vandalism.--CyberGhostface 03:06, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- Furthermore, the reason why I insulted her wasn't because of her poor grammar, it was because she vandalized the article twice in one day with her moronic comments. So when I vandalize an article with "Paris Hilton as Betty Lupfer" you can call me on a slight grammatical error. And I'm still curious why no one has put a warning on her page yet you still felt the need to reprimand me.--CyberGhostface 03:18, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'm sorry as well for overreacting. BTW, I have a number of times requested protection but its always turned down.--CyberGhostface 16:22, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re User:71.231.189.178
It's been six hours since that IP was last active, so I guess the guy just got bored. No need to block it right now; if it does cause trouble again warn the account and put it up on WP:AIV. Sam Vimes | Address me 07:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] About Sum 41
Hey, I'm just another freak and you've seen the supposed track listing on the new album by Sum 41, so what do you think, do you think that kids a crackpot, if you have the source of where he got that, plz tell me now.
[edit] Garfield's proof
Hi - Can you explain why you deleted mention of Garfield's proof at Pythagorean theorem and James Garfield, for example this edit? The edit summaries weren't very informative, so just thought I'd ask. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 01:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your RfA
Hi there, it seems that your RfA in not on the list of RfAs. Perhaps your RfA is not complete? See WP:RFA/N. Regards, Flyguy649 18:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. One thing, I've never tried for RfA myself, but looking at a couple of recent ones, people are looking for something like 4000 edits, and a history of vandalism reversion and article writing/revision. I suggest you look at some of the ones that have been both successful and those which have failed. Good luck, Flyguy649 03:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Meriweather
That's completely besides the point. Meriweather is an unsigned rookie whose rights are held by the Patriots. Testaverde is an unrestricted free agent. Testaverde has only said he'll sign with the Pats once training camp is over. Because of WP:CRYSTAL, Testaverde can't be listed on this roster just because he said he might/will sign with the team in a month's time. Pats1 23:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)