User talk:SW2001 E

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Mekaela academies. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eetvartti (talk) 18:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mekaela Academies

I wanted to change the articles header to "Mekaela Academies" with one capital letter for each word. Now it stands at "Mekaela academies" with I found rather ugly. SW2001 E (talk) 18:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mekaela Academies

I edited this page in a hurry (my fault) and spoilt the article's header to leave the word "academies" without a capital "A". How do I change that? SW2001 E (talk) 18:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I replied on the article's talk page. I'll move it for you if you want. GlobeGores (talk | contribs) 19:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I've tagged one of the articles for speedy deletion to make way for the move. GlobeGores (talk | contribs) 19:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I could not find a "move" button at the top of the article, but I found a deletion request comment. I do not understand why the information was not verifiable or reliable?!? I would be very happy if you could sort this out for me. SW2001 E (talk) 22:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mekaela Academies

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mekaela Academies, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Mekaela Academies.

• I have converted your lowercase title to the uppercase naming, but the article still requires sources demonstrating its notability ot it should be deleted from Wikipedia. —dgies^t_c 21:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

• Thanks for the help. However have not understood why the article should be unfit for publishing. Would links to newspaper articles or TV footage be considered as reliable sources?
  • Things published by mainstream media not affiliated with your group would be great. Things like press releases, not so much. —dgies^t_c 22:46, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

• • I added a few links to the article, but apart from ZDF and Hamburger Abendblatt that can hardly be called mainstream media. We have stories which covered the project in German yellow press and on in a UK paper, but none of them is available online, we just have the scans. I got the point, though.SW2001 E (talk) 23:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
    • While having online versions of your sources is nice, it is not required. You can still cite offline versions. For more information, see Wikipedia:Citing sources. —dgies^t_c 23:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)