User talk:Svik

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Svik! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Image:Wikisigbutton.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Khoikhoi 03:58, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous


[edit] Jane Sandanski

Jane Bugarin you must be nuts?Since you are a Bulgarian,go to Sandanski and say to those who are living ther "Jane e B'lgarin"you'll see the respond??HaHa

[edit] Makedoncite udruženi so Bugarite

Dreem on!!!Why don't you come to Macedonia and see how much they like Bulgars.Or mybee you shoud go to Tatarstan and see by your own who the real Bulgars are!!

[edit] Hey buddy

Hey Svik, as a fellow Wikipedian, I'd like to thank you for your contributions (to the world of knowledge) and I beg you to think about the following:

  • You support your BulgarianPOV, I support my POV (which I think is THE POV), I understand that. Ok? Do you? Ok then, since I KNOW that Wikipedia wouldn't allow any of these POV's to stand alone, I (just as all the other Wikipedians) am constantly trying and trying to find a POV that would be just OK with all of us (that POV is called THE NPOV - Neutral Point Of View). I'm sure you know this.
  • Now, YOU, as I can see, won't let the NPOV live. You just won't. I'm not stupid and I know that this is unacceptable for you: Jane Sandanski was a Macedonian revolutionary full stop . I know and I don't write that. But, you, also, should know that this is unacceptable for us (Macedonians): Jane Sandanski was a Bulgarian revolutionary. Right? Ok? Good. My offer was that it should be like this: Jane Sandanski was a revolutionary from Macedonia, which is the actual truth. Right? Isn't it? That, my friend, is called NeutralPOV.

Please talk to me and tell me what is wrong with that sentence. And why do you think that you can write anything you want on Wikipedia? It is called the free encyclopedia, not the Bulgarian encyclopedia for Pete's sake! Until next time, stay civilized, INkubusse 02:25, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Svik, my English is not very good, but I want to ask you if you or other have an opportunity, please translate theese words of INkubusse from Macedonian Wikipedia - [1] - Еве јас ќе ви кажам „какво“ е балгарскија език. Си биле Македонците (кои имале убав словенски јазик) и од Азија дошле Татарите кои биле тешки варвари, нецивилизирани ѕверови без трунка култура (не дај Боже убав јазик и религија). Византијците им наложиле (преку декрет!) да го учат словенскиот јазик (македонскиот!) и да се покрстат. Преку гнасен и тежок процес, се создала денешната бугарска нација, која зборува гнасен словенолик јазик (но јасно се забележува дека не е природен словенски јазик) и си ги крсти децата со христијански имиња, ама сѐ уште има многу Асановци, Аспаруховци итн итн... На кратко, Бугарите (кои се насила покрстени и „словенизирани“) денес зборуваат варијанта од нашиот (македонски) јазик, но многу расипана и испоганчена, а бидејќи имаат посилна држава, не **** како што сакаат. Благодарам и поздрав од еден Македонец од Порече! П.С. Се разбира дека ќе најдеш „извори“, та во тебе ја имаш способноста да фалсификуваш и да ја искривуваш историјата и ФАКТИТЕ! Знаејќи што сѐ прават Бугарите, зборот факт веќе нема никакво значење, а Википедија ТРПИ од вашите блогови што ги користите како извори. П.П.С. Господ ве мрази! Поречанец 09:45, 30 август 2007 (UTC).
It would be very interesting about some customs in Balkans and about the civility of some of our friends in Republic of Macedonia. They are not very much, but they are existing and here they pretetend to be democratic, but when they feel strong they use personal and national attacks--GrigorG 20:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)