Talk:Suzy Shuster

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] "Controversies"

I've removed the ridiculous "controversies" section again. One, it's not even a little bit encyclopedic. Two, Shuster is not accused of doing anything remotely controversial. Let's use some common sense, please. | Mr. Darcy talk 03:31, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Per WP:Undue: "An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject, but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Note that undue weight can be given in several ways, including, but not limited to, depth of detail, quantity of text, prominence of placement, and juxtaposition of statements." Shuster's article is essentially a stub. The "controversy" section is about half of the article, and her only involvement was a sarcastic email response. Therefore, I agree with above, and will remove section because it gives undue weight to the significance to the subject. Mitico (talk) 14:21, 18 December 2007 (UTC)