From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. |
|
|
| Start |
This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] |
| More information about this article... |
|
|
|
The following comments have been left for this page:
This article amounts to marketing and promotion for this photographer--its not informative and seems to serve no purpose other than giving the person some press. It doesn't even have samples of her work! (edit) |
|
[edit] NPOV comment
Just in case anyone is curious, this article is not intended as a hatchet job. The photographer revels in her reputation of being difficult to deal with, and I have run this wording by her -- she has approved the phrasing. The articles that I have quoted as references, confirm the demeanor and the comments. The wording here on Wikipedia is as neutral as I could manage -- if anyone would like to figure out a way to present the demeanor in a more neutral fashion, feel free! --Elonka 00:48, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Why does this article exist?
I've been an advertising art director for nearly five years, three of those years spent in St. Louis, and I'm hardly familiar with this individual. She doesn't register on the radar screen outside of doing the occasional portrait for local publications. Which means she's like a lot of other photographers, thus not that spectacular. She hardly warrants being on Wikipedia, and even worse, none of her work is dispalyed. Focusing on her "reputation" (which isn't nearly as interesting or visible as this article claims) is pathetic. A photographer is defined by their pictures, not their attitude. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bradleygutting (talk • contribs) 11:05, November 17, 2006
- On Wikipedia, notability is sometimes judged not by the quality of someone's photos, but by the amount of press attention that an individual receives. Someone could be a fantastic photographer, but unless they won an award or were written up in the newspaper, that doesn't make them "notable." As for St. Louis photographers, if you know of others who you believe should have Wikipedia biographies, please by all means bring up their names, or go ahead and create stub articles on them. As for why Ms. Gorman's work is not displayed, that is probably because there are no "public domain" images of her work. If you would like to see her images, I am sure there is a link to her website somewhere in the article. --Elonka 08:07, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
