Talk:Suzuki Swift
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of Wikipedia Project Automobiles, a collective approach to creating a comprehensive guide to the world of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you are encouraged to visit the project page, where you can contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. | |
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. | |
"In Europe, the MK3 series was known as "MK2 - Phase 2", the European market ceased production in 1996..."
What? The Swift was still available in Ireland as late as 2000, and I heard production had moved to Hungary by then. --Zilog Jones 00:45, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Engine weight
The engine weight is mentioned in the first para, but it is not clear whether that is the weight of the current model. Is it?
→ All G10 engines have the same or similar weight Enerider 23:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Mk4 Swift Sport
I have been researching the suzuki swift two-door hatchback cars online. So far, they are made available in India, Singapore, United Kingdom, all except the United States. These are awesome cars. Fuel efficient, sporty and compact. I am an owner of a 1992 suzuki swift and I adore it. However, it has seen better days and will not take me much further unless i do many repairs. How Do I obtain A new Suzuki Sport. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.42.102.54 (talk) 22:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC).
- Unfortunately, you'll either have to wait 15 years (if you're in Canada), 25 years (if you're in the US), or move to Europe to get one. Bhtooefr 00:40, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Swift+
There's a stub for the Suzuki Swift+ that I think should be included in the Swift article, as it's probably not notable enough to have an article for itself. -UberMan5000 03:52, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
→ Added a link for now Enerider 23:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
This has been cleared up by a consolidation of the Kalos derivatives also. 842U (talk) 15:12, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Suzuki Swift Sport.jpg
Image:Suzuki Swift Sport.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] so wheres the merger discussion?
I dont see one anywhere here... if none come up I'm removing the templates... --hydkat 10:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- do include M1000 in swift better merge M1000 with maruti esteem —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.189.142.182 (talk) 08:26, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
I have begun integrating the Geo Metro, Chevrolet Sprint and Pontiac Firefly articles into the Suzuki Cultus article. The early sections of this article would belong also under the Cultus, as well. 842U (talk) 03:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Generations?
Problem: according to the article there is a Generation 3, which is a restyling of Gen 2... where Gen 3 which had a different wheelbase, updated crash standards and modified engines... is called a Gen3.5. This isn't right.
Also, the Generation 3 seciton refers to several "types" -- suggesting the versions of this gen were "called" by these type names. What is the source of this info? 842U (talk) 21:05, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Merge
A merge has incorporated the Pontiac Firefly, Geo & Chevrolet Metro and Chevrolet Sprint articles into the Suzuki Cultus articles. The intention is to leave the Swift article, but to remove much of the overlapping "Cultus" information from the Swift article with redirects to the Cultus article. Much like the Holden Barina article, which covers a nameplate that bridges several variously sourced automotibles, the Swift article will remain, with "lightened" sections and redirects to the Cultus. 842U (talk) 15:10, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Changes have been made across the article to bring the Generation nomenclature in line with the Suzuki Cultus article for a pending merge. The article had in place a series of generational nomenclares around MK2 and MK3 that were had no references to substantiate their specifics.
If at some point we can find the internal designations for all the models, we can revert to those. 842U (talk) 14:44, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
