Talk:Sutta Pitaka

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Religion Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a joint subproject of WikiProject Religion and WikiProject Books, and a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religious texts-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Start	This article has been rated as Start on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. Please participate by editing the article Sutta Pitaka, or visit the project page for more details on the projects. Guidelines: Chinese Manual of Style - Naming conventions Indic Manual of Style - Naming conventions Japanese Manual of Style Korean Manual of Style - Naming conventions Tibetan Proposed naming conventions
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Consistency: Sanscrit vs. Pali

The Tripitaka/Tipitaka article uses the Sanscrit spelling, but as of this page, the Pali spellings are used. Should these be kept consistent? I'm not familiar with usage of the Sanscrit spellings for the Tipitaka, but if others are, perhaps they can update them. -- Jketola 1 July 2005 19:09 (UTC)

We should use Pali when we're talking specifically about the Pali Canon and Sanskrit when we're combining material about different versions of the Scriptures. Peter jackson 10:28, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Numbering for Samyutta and Anguttara is inconsistent. Peter jackson 17:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

I've deleted the material about other Sutra Pitakas, which doesn't belong here. I've started a separate article Sutra Pitaka, just a stub so far. Someone who knows how to do it might like to move the deleted material there, and perhaps correct the Japanglish as well. Peter jackson 16:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)