Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Reasonablelogicalman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] User:Reasonablelogicalman

Suspected sockpuppeteer
Reasonablelogicalman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log · rfcu)
Suspected sockpuppets
Schmoopster (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Report submission by

  Skopp   07:51, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Evidence

Numerous edits to Prostatitis and associated talk page to insert spam. Also posts from IP 165.166.193.82 for the same purposes. Persistent and disruptive spammer, owns numerous .ORG sites dealing with difficult conditions and urgently canvasses donations, sells self published books at some of the sites, promotes fringe theories and unacceptable concepts (human cloning). Complains that an exclusion of links to his sites is a "suppression of freedom of speech." Ignores consensus against him.   Skopp   08:08, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments

SKOPPENSBOER, the commercial webmaster/supporter of ChronicProstatitis.com refuses to allow neutral points of view edits to the prostatitis page and keeps putting ChronicProstatitis.com as the first link under the prostatitis page and under the pelvic myoneuropathy page. Here is falsely claims me to be a sock puppet and makes other personal attacks. Please see his edit history at prostatitis and his link, to his commercial website, which always remains as the first one, even when replaced by the DMOZ prostatitis link in accordance with Wikipedia rules when there is a conflict. Reasonablelogicalman 18:47, 30 September 2007 (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Reasonablelogicalman (talkcontribs) 18:41, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

I am not a sock puppet. I am not on an individual ISP. I have been alleged to be Schmoopster, which I obviously am not. I am a relative newbie trying to edit in good faith. I suspect SKOPP User:Skoppensboer is the sock puppet. Why do I suspect this? Because SKOPP, my accuser, is a supporter of the commercial website, www.ChronicProstatitis.com [1], which is an anonymous website. The links on the Prostatitis Prostatitis page keep getting spammed with links to www.ChronicProstatitis.com, or links that link to ChronicProstatitis.com. Even apparently copyrighted medical pictures have been used as Billboards to ChronicProstatitis.com via the links on Prostatitis. Furthermore, Sci.med.prostate.prostatitis was once a thriving USENET newsgroup started by professionals with doctors, researchers, and patients all over the world having coherent discussions. Then www.ChronicProstatitis.com came along and spammed and flamed everyone to death until the newsgroup was driven from a high activity group into almost nonexistance. ChronicProstatitis.com used anonymous remailers, and sock puppets, to spam and flame that newsgroup. Please verify this by searching there on ChronicProstatitis.com. SKOPP User:Skoppensboer appears to be doing the same thing here in support of ChronicProstatitis.com. His editing all mimics the material from ChronicProstatitis.com and the past flaming and spamming at Sci.med.prostate.prostatitis. Here, SKOPP flames his opposition, makes false allegations, and personal attacks. He does not stay on topic about editing. And he keeps spam linking, one way or another, to ChronicProstatitis.com. Silverye User:Silverye has suddenly appeared to ad support to ChronicProstatitis.com: Silverye says, "* The removal of http://www.chronicprostatitis.com/forum has been the worst thing to have happened to the Prostatitis wikipedia page. Very poor decision. Silverye 06:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)" About the apparently copyrighted medical pictures defaced with billboard ads to ChronicProstatitis.com Silverye says, "I found the first 2 diagrams on http://www.geocities.com/myoneuropathy/ to be especially invaluable to my understanding of this condition - shame to take that chance of understanding away from others by removing the link. Silverye 14:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC)" So we have two editors at the Prostatitis page who support a commercial website, which is anonymous, and not affiliated with any doctor or medical professional. ReasonableLogicalMan 12:21, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


Conclusions