Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Lojah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

[edit] User:Lojah

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Lojah (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Curvedtalk (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

LeaHazel : talk : contribs 12:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Evidence

1. 18 March, User:Lojah created.
2. 18 March, User:Lojah begins editing the Shadowyze article.
3. April 1, User:MSJapan lists the article on AFD (listing).
4. April 3, User:Curvedtalk created.
5. April 3, User:Curvedtalk protests against the AFD on the article's talk page, based on an interest in the history of hip-hop. April 3, User:Lojah agrees.
6. April 3, User:Curvedtalk posts to the AFD, repeating the same argument about the history of hip-hop.
7. Curvedtalk has no other contributions.

Comments

While User:Lojah does not seem to be a single-purpose account basedon the contributions, s/he has been editing Shadowyze extensively, reverting others' good faith edits ([1]) and has been listed on WP:COI/N.

User:Curvedtalk is a sockpuppet or meatpuppet created/recruited by User:Lojah; at any rate, it is a single-purpose account.

---I'm curious to know how you came to this conclusion? You have little more than circumstancial evidence. This whole page is slander and I will be contacting an administrator about this. Lojah 22:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Conclusions

• Evidence is suggestive, but not conclusive enough to connect Lojah and Curvedtalk. However, Curvedtalk is a single-purpose account, and will be blocked on that basis. --Akhilleus (talk) 05:36, 7 April 2007 (UTC)