Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Kirbylevel4 (2nd)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
[edit] User:Kirbylevel4
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
Kirbylevel4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
S.p.p.g.c.f.block (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
Patar knight - chat/contributions 22:20, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Evidence
S.p.p.g.c.f.block has requested me to unblock Robot666, a confirmed sockpuppet of Kirbylevel4, here: [1], and seems fixed on this, as he later repeats the request here: [2]. Taking a look at S.p.p.g.c.f.block's contributions, they are all either on his talk page, my talk page, or other users' talk pages. He only has one main edit which hasn't been deleted, which is to Ness's entry at List of Earthbound characters. Ness, is a character from the Super Smash Bros series, one that Kirbylevel4 was also interested in editing. Coincidentally, both of their first contributions were to this article, under the same section (Kirbylevel4's edit:[3], and S.p.p.g.c.f.block's edit:[4]). The only other mainspace contribution that he has was a page which was speedily deleted, Charlie and the candy moutian, a page which Robot666, also created once (see:[5]).
- Comments
After checking through the diffs and the contributions of the suspected sock puppet, the evidence seems very clear and strong. The fact that an "uninvolved" user would protest an administrator to unblock another user, while editing the same section of an article, seems far too coincidental here, and the suspected sock displays similar traits to the puppet master's other sock puppets. This seems like a rather open/shut case to me. Steve Crossin (talk) (review) 09:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Conclusions
Blocked and tagged. GBT/C 15:17, 27 April 2008 (UTC)