Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Helicoptor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
[edit] User:Helicoptor
- Evidence
User Helicoptor (talk • contribs • logs) and Hardee67 (talk • contribs • logs) have similar interests in their contribution history. The Hardee67 account picks up where Helicopter left off in July. User Helicopter caused trouble back in July when several articles they had edited came up for AfD. They were also involved with moving pages, such as Cat flap against concensus. User Helicopter became dormant on 21 July, but user Hardee67 started editing on 19 July. After a number of minor edits to planet articles (which were all reverted), Hardee67 votes on some of the AfD that Helicoptor was involved in, e.g. [1] [2]. They also have similar interests in large number articles (million and trillion related). Hardee67 is now is nominating other articles for AfD where Helicopter had previously had disputes.
- Comments
- This is very weak evidence, and I do not feel it is enought to merit a block. Iolakana|T 11:49, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Have you checked their contributions? When someone starts making numerous spurious AfD nominations without having any previous involvement in the articles concerned, you can be pretty sure they are somebody's sockpuppet. Notice the 10th attempt at a delete on Daniel Brandt and the 6th attempt on Girlfriend. This quite appart from the rest of the vandalism and disruption they are causing. -- Solipsist 14:10, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- I say that Hardee67 needs to be blocked indefinitely. His account is being used only for vandalism. Georgia guy 14:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
