Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Diamonddannyboy (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

[edit] User:Diamonddannyboy

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Diamonddannyboy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log · rfcu)

Suspected sockpuppets

Sillybilly2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

90.209.117.4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

Mayalld (talk) 08:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Evidence

Puppetmaster created article on Darren M Jackson which is going through AfD as a nn bio, and has strenuously defended the article. Puppet was created yesterday as a new account, and immediately created a copy of the article at Darren 'Jack' Jackson. Both users display a similar habit of signing talk page posts with only 3 tildes.

Both articles have been edited by User:90.209.117.4, in each case the IP appears to be the same user as the logged in user editing. (RFCU filed)

Comments

What crap, some one is hell bent in the Darren M Jackson article being deleted due to its enthnic back ground of Romany decent, so another editer as sock puppeted article, Darren M Jackson proves notable, due to this fact , others have created or copied artcile to dicredit author total crap more injudice for Romany folk on wikipedia. All or most people sign off with 3 titles, and sock puppet can copy my title. This does not prove a thing total rubbish. Editer just want Darren M Jackson to be deleted any any way, could not do through wikipedia criteria of notability, so have created a sock puppet.Diamonddannyboy (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 08:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

On the contrary, MOST people sign off with FOUR tildes, and signing with three is quite unusual. You make several claims above;

• I am hell bent on deleting the article due to its ethic background

• Nonsense, and I resent the unfounded playing of the "race card" here

• Somebody else created the copy of the article

• Somehow that is difficult to believe. You have a history of creating this article (see an old version of your talk page for details), and it being deleted, and a history of being suspected of using socks to do so. Strangely enough, these other accounts only spring up at about the same time as you are actively trying to get an article on this guy created. Do you seriously expect that people will believe that somebody else just happened to create a new account, and immediately make a copy of the article that is up for deletion.

• I just want the article to be deleted an will stop at nothing.

• Untrue, and I resent the accusation. Despite my opinion that the subject is not notable, I have bent over backwards to help you to improve the article so that it would have the fairest possible consideration at AfD. In any case, the outcome of this case will have no effect whatsoever on the Outcome of the AfD

Mayalld (talk) 13:51, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Conclusions

Sillybilly2 has already been blocked and tagged by UltraExactZZ following the positive CU result. Diamonddannyboy blocked one week for disruption. _GB^T/C 17:53, 18 March 2008 (UTC)