Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Alinob77 (2nd)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Alinob77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Devonshirep (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Ogilevye (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Rollistong (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

Improbcat 18:15, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Evidence

See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Alinob77 for users previous four socks. Previous socks were banned & user received a 2 week block early this morning.

Two new socks were created and immediately edited the same discussion as the previous four socks[1] [2] (deletion review for an article Alinob77 is trying to get restored).
Suspected socks use same writing style as Alinob77 & previous socks, and one sock removes strikeouts through previous sock comments & multiple votes by Alinob77.

Comments

All socks have been blocked by admin. IMO, the sockpuppeteer (User:Alinob77) should have his block extended because he obviously did not learn from his 2 week block this morning. - Rjd0060 18:31, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Nevermind, it was extended already. See the block log. - Rjd0060 18:33, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Conclusions

Yeah, I had an interruption before I extended the block. This can be archived by someone who knows this process' system. GRBerry 18:40, 4 October 2007 (UTC)