Talk:Surveillance abuse
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] NPOV
I take issue with the statement "mass surveillance by the state may constitute surveillance abuse if not appropriately regulated" in that it contains a judgement that mass surveillance is not abusive under most circumstances. Isn't the very concept of mass surveillance contrary to societal norms regarding expectations of privacy? Alvis 04:40, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] VfD
On April 26, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep (no consensus). See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Surveillance abuse for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 20:13, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
- I have started a major overhaul of this page. Others are welcome to join in.--Cberlet 20:26, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
What is this licence plate nonsense? I cant make out heads or tails of this? whats a MFU? whats a NAB, UAT, UAF? This is U.S. specific 'info'? Why is this relevant? GOD loving person speaking from a scripture??? Are these consequences of some vandalism of this article? --83.131.139.12 07:15, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GPS/GSM bugs - a totalitarian surveillance weapon from hell
Make sure you visit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gps_tracking , and also the ongoing discussion. The latest entry which summarizes the situation is '7 Agent X2: Basically thanks - with a 'little' more'.
Please contribute, if you can, and spread the word!
Michael Laudahn 11:00, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
This looks bogus:
Women’s privacy rights are particularly vulnerable to video surveillance technology. “Up-skirting” and “down-blousing”—using camera cell phones to surreptitiously take pictures up women’s skirts or down their blouses—has become something of a trend on college campuses and city streets. Police officers have used video surveillance cameras to engage in such conduct. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.81.136.8 (talk) 22:56, 27 January 2008 (UTC)