User talk:Supaagekireddo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Supaagekireddo. |
Welcome!
Hello, Supaagekireddo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
[edit] Warnings
Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | interiot's tool | page moves | block log | block list]
[edit] August 2007
- Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to South Crest School. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Tiptoety 06:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
- Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
- Make your case on the article's talk page.
- Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Tiptoety 06:47, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Image:Southcrestlogo.jpg. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Papa November 08:15, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Southcrestlogo.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Southcrestlogo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 00:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Duplicate Image:Southcrestlogo2.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Southcrestlogo2.jpg, by Staeckerbot (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Southcrestlogo2.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Southcrestlogo2.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:24, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Southcrestlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Southcrestlogo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November 08:33, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Southcrestlogo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Southcrestlogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:42, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] No content in Category:Secondary Schools in Muntinlupa CVity
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Secondary Schools in Muntinlupa CVity, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Secondary Schools in Muntinlupa CVity has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Secondary Schools in Muntinlupa CVity, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 06:32, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Inazuma.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Inazuma.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:52, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Inazumaspark.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Inazumaspark.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:2004---ignatius-oblation.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:2004---ignatius-oblation.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:2004---ignatius-oblation.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:2004---ignatius-oblation.gif. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
- On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mr.Z-man 20:56, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Zaido Criticism References
Seems they need "references" for the Zaido criticisms. I suggest you look for linkable references to fan displeasure. Mike Abundo —Preceding comment was added at 06:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. -Danngarcia 16:10, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] your sources for "controversy" section of Zaido: Pulis Pangkalawakan
All the links and references for the "Criticism" section that you provided are blogs and forums, which under Wikipedia's policies are invalid references (Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:External links). That makes the whole section look like an original research. Unless you provide a reliable reference (like an article from the PEP; not a forum link, a news article from a newspaper or a press release from GMA or any other network) then the section should be removed.
Also try to read this (Talk:Super Twins/Archive 1). This is an archive of the talk page of Super Twins in which an editor is persistent to add a "Controversy" section where his provided sources are just blogs and discussion boards. -Danngarcia 17:06, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- Please read Wikipedia:Reliable sources: blogs, networking websites, Friendster, Multiply, Myspace, web discussion forums aren't valid references. --Howard the Duck 15:18, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MariGoldDeka.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:MariGoldDeka.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kivaa
"Kivaa" is the name given in the first articles from the Japanese toy/hobby magazines. If you have a source in Japanese that calls it "Kiver" in Latin letters, then that spelling might be used.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 08:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
ALSO, "Fangaia" is what is used at TV Asahi's official website, not "Fangire" as it was originally until the name appeared in Latin letters in an official Japanese source. Do not change these, again, unless you have something that says they are a different name.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 08:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Blade cards
I have had to delete all of the uploads you have made of the Kamen Rider Blade cards because you falsely claimed that you owned the copyright on those images. Despite what you do to copyrighted artwork, it is still under the original copyright as it is a derived work.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 10:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC)