User talk:Sup3rior/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Re: RED LINKS

I'm sorry, I don't see how WP:RED is relevant to the note you left on my talk page, "Remove red links". You advise me to read the guideline, yet I doubt how well you've read it yourself. The guideline advises that redlinks should be kept when they are relevant to the context of the article, or removed if they lead to articles that will never - or will not timely - be created. I also quote "Good red links help Wikipedia" when it comes to encouragement in article creation. IMO WP:RED does not justify your POV, "Remove red links". Any reasons why I shouldn't add those double brackets back in, citing a guideline that actually supports your argument? •97198 talk 06:08, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Reply

You should wait until the episode airs before you add anything to character articles. -- Scorpion0422 23:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

If you have a source, then it can be added to the episode page, but I don't think it's necessary for the season page. -- Scorpion0422 23:31, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Navbox colours

The {{Navbox}} page itself has instructions on how to change the template's colour, or you could just copy the code from the {{TDIS1}} template. The colour codes use hex, and if you look up a colour in wikipedia, you can find the hex code on the page. Please do not use bright red, as it can cause seizures.-Malkinann 01:19, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Red links

Seeing as you've archived my comment without replying, I'm assuming you don't disagree with me. I'll add them back :) •97198 talk 08:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

I know you want them gone, or "blue-ified", but what I'm after is a reason why they should all be removed. I'm also keen to know whether you just wanted to blue-ify the links in Category:Desperate Housewives episodes or within the whole Wikipedia database? ;) •97198 talk 10:24, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TrentPromisesToGwen.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TrentPromisesToGwen.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Zoey 101. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Compwhiz II 01:22, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Using edit summaries will head off a lot of misunderstandings about what you are trying to accomplish with the Zoey 101 articles. Without them others are forced to guess what you are trying to do. --NrDg 01:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Okay Sorry

Sorry about my revert. Like the last person said using edit summaries to show what you did. Good luck in future edits! Compwhiz II 03:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Reply

There is nothing scheduled for after Funeral for a Fiend. According to the official Fox press releases, the sunday there is a special BCS thing at 8, and the week after is a rerun. According to The Futon Critic, the rest of December will air reruns. -- Scorpion0422 04:49, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Keep an eye on posts made in this page. Usually, it is pretty up to date and press releases are posted in short order. -- Scorpion0422 04:57, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

season pages

nice work....do u know how to link all the seasons into the episode template...it was talked about here Ctjf83 06:04, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

i just tried it a few times, but can't figure out how to do it! hope u can! :) Ctjf83 06:50, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
it does look so much better...it was Scorpion0422 who did it! Ctjf83 03:37, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

User:24.83.140.240‎

Calm down mate. I'm not one to talk but you have to speak to vandels niceley, or could this be an edit war? I have had a few in my time, so ask user:24.83.140.240 to cite his sources, or if his edits are unconstructive request a page protection for 24 hours or so the both of you can calm down. If he is vandalising, and he has a significant history of unconstructive edits report him here

Cf38 (talk) 21:25, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Stephanie Anne Mills, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0590195/. As a copyright violation, Stephanie Anne Mills appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Stephanie Anne Mills has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Stephanie Anne Mills and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Stephanie Anne Mills with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Stephanie Anne Mills.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. ✤ JonHarder talk 00:32, 21 November 2007 (UTC)