Talk:Supporting organization (charity)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve tax-related articles to a feature-quality standard.
Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritizing and managing its workload.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-priority on the Project's priority scale.
After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's comments page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses.
⚖
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
??? This article has not yet received a quality rating on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been assessed as low-importance on the assessment scale.

[edit] Hello

Hey, I just started this, fill out at will but make the appropriate footnotes. I'll fill this out periodically as I go by, but right now I have to finish some crim pro reading - EECavazos 22:34, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] References and Footnotes

I'll put in my references and footnotes upon finishing up this article. I have them readily available, it's just a bit of work to put them in when I can far more easily fill out the article. EECavazos 22:01, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Right now I think I'll finish up the content, then work on the footnotes. After the footnotes, I'll fix up the references to make hyperlinks to the documents. Exciting stuff. EECavazos 15:47, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Peer review

I'm going to have a look at this soon. I'll probably make changes on the fly if I see something simple that needs it. Morphh (talk) 0:25, 05 May 2007 (UTC)

I've added my thoughts to Wikipedia:WikiProject Taxation/Peer review/Supporting organization (charity). You've certainly put in a lot of work here and it's looking good. Great job. Morphh (talk) 3:06, 05 May 2007 (UTC)