Talk:Superior Defender Gundam Force

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve and expand anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.

Contents

[edit] Rumors

Verifiability? Hackwrench 10:42, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Things said at cons and certain sources. Not everything in life will have a nice quote or weblink you can cite.--HellCat86 11:33, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Would someone please check

I know nothing of the topic. This edit came from an account also used for vandalism, so someone who does know the topic should check it closely. - Jmabel | Talk 06:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

  • The stuff about white Bagu Bagu? It's correct--HellCat86 10:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cleanup?

I think this article could do with some clean up. It covers alot of ground but is thus bloated. I'd suggest we move the character section to it's own entry and perhaps just keep a mention of the main characters (Shute and the Gundams, DA trio and the Zakos)--HellCat86 11:54, 18 September 2006 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Superior_Defender_Gundam_Force_characters --HellCat86 12:06, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Also, the insinuation that 'most anime is meant for kids even in Japan' is ludicrous. I've seen this in transformers articles too, I have no idea who keeps putting it in.
Not really, it's true. Whilst there are certain anime shows that skew towards the older fans, the fact is alot of non-Japanese anime fans see all this 'mature' content and automatically assume just about every anime is intended for adults. Japan has different standards, so there kids shows can get away with more serious elements. Specfically in relation to this article, alot of SDGF's attackers ranted stuff like "Gundam isn't this kiddy crap, it's mature stuff for adults!". That's incorrect as there are alot more signs which show which market it's aimed at that aren't seen outside of Japan. SEED for example has various web and print content aimed at kids.--HellCat86 19:20, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Samurai vs Musha

The show highlights the characters to be "Musha," not "Samurai." "Musha (武者)" is a shortened form of Bugeisha (武芸者). I tend to avoid all dubbed anime these days so I don't know if the show's English dub (mistakenly) says "Samurai" or not. Anyways, I've checked the official (Japanese) website http://www.sunrise-inc.co.jp/sd_gundamforce/. (My Japanese isn't that good so please feel free to double check it.) Seven 03:53, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

The official term is Musha Gundam but most fans take it easily enough that Musha Gundam is based on samurai. Just look at it- Ark is based on feudal Japan, Musha Gundams practice bushido, wear intricate samurai/shogun armour, there's a clear class system based on the one practiced in Japan at that time, etc. It's all an extension of how the original 'real type' Gundam was based on samurai armour--HellCat86 11:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
I'll check the official website more throughly (when I have time.) Though, isn't it safer to use "fictional martial artists" rather than "fictional samurai"? Seven 21:40, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Not really. On a series like Musha Bancho Fuunroku I'd say yes, because that involves more of various fighting styles in a modern day school setting. However, Musha Gundam is generally based on classic samurai. Specifically for SDGF, Bell Wood even says during Bakunetsumaru's first appearance "He's some kind of samurai!". I've already listed most of the reasons why Musha Gundam counts as samurai. Listing it as 'fictional martial artists' would also be unfair as the Knight Gundam element of the show gets it labelled under 'Fictional Knights'--HellCat86 21:58, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Also, the word musha is closely connected with samurai tradition. I believe the wikipedia article on samurai even mentions this.

Correct.

"Musha (武者) A shortened form of bugeisha (武芸者), lit. martial art man." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.53.37.218 (talk) 12:04, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Da Jarle (sotsu-ag.co.jp).jpg

Image:Da Jarle (sotsu-ag.co.jp).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Sdgundamposter.jpg

Image:Sdgundamposter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)