Talk:Sunset Coast CLC

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flag
Portal
 Sunset Coast CLC is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Perth.
Assessment comments
Christianity
Christianity Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Charismatic Christianity. (with unknown importance)
Assessment comments

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sunset Coast CLC article.
Article policies

[edit] earlier comments

Improved the notability (I think) of the article. Added a couple of references, and deleted the notability tag. If what I've done could be improved on please feel free to give me advice on how to do so here. I would like to publish this according to the Wikipedia guidelines. Please bare with me as I am new to publishing articles on Wikipedia. I apoligise if I have somehow not done things correctly.

Marv87 05:13, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi again a couple of points Notability says a topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The current sources dont meet the reliable source criteria of independence, one is a primary source and the other doesnt have any detail as such it isnt "significant coverage". Additionally all articles need to follow WP:NPOV and the use of peacock wording should be removed. Gnangarra 13:33, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for all your feedback. I disagree somewhat that the entire article deserves the 'unreferenced' tag, given that the second reference I have included is from a Televised Segment about the church which includes most if not all of any information included. Nevertheless, I do agree that it needs further citation, and perhaps a way to verify such a source and have replaced it with the 'refimprove' tag. (Do you have any suggestions as to how I might be able to increase the verifiability of this particular reference? Get a transcript of the televised segment and publish it somehow perhaps so that anyone can read it online?) It might even be that I need to add MORE references. *shrugs*.
I will keep working over the article and finding more sources to back up the ones I already have. I will also try to wrinkle out any 'peacock' language to improve the article's neutrality. Thanks for all your help. Marv87 15:22, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Marv if you look at this diff you see examples what I'm referring to as peacock and WP:NPOV wording. Gnangarra 15:54, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Noted, and thanks again. I have uploaded my own 'revised' edition of the article, attempting to remove peacock wording where I've been able to spot it. There were some things I wanted to include in the article (if possible), but I have tried to adjust their wording to make it more compliant with Wikipedia's NPOV policy. Is the article improving or am I just creating a editor's headache? :-/
Marv87 16:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
PS: I thought that if it proved useful, maybe you could provide [citation needed] tags and some invisible edits where I might be able to improve on its wikipedia compliance. This article in particular is my personal project, and I'm hoping to get THIS one up and running properly before moving onto others. Cheers. Marv87 16:17, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Service times arent encyclopedic(section removed) except in a general sense, ie weekly on sundays like in East Perth Cemeteries#St. Bartholomew's Church Gnangarra 16:26, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
I hope you don't mind, but since the NPOV dispute seems to be (at least mostly) resolved, I have deleted the 'NPOV' tag on the article. Marv87 03:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

Trying to rewrite and reform the article to comply with Wikipedia's quality standards. I'm working on collecting more content from a variety of resources, but all information within the article can be found by watching the reference provided (WakeUP! WA). If you would like to help by placing reference tags throughout the article, please point them all to the one item unless you know another place similarly 'up to date' reliable information can be found. Marv87 (talk) 08:03, 4 June 2008 (UTC)