Talk:Sunken Village Archeological Site

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of listings on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Oregon Portal
This page is part of WikiProject Oregon, a WikiProject dedicated to articles related to the U.S. state of Oregon.
To participate: join (or just read up) at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.
PSU stuff & Applegate Trail are the current Collaborations of the week.
Stub This page is rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article is rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Oregon may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

[edit] Photos

Photos and/or photo uploads are needed.

  • HABS photos do not seem to be available.
  • NRHP text and photos seem to be unavailable on-line, also.
  • New photos are needed.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Doncram (talk • contribs) 03:58, November 20, 2007
I think it would be close to impossible to get any new images of an address-restricted archaeological site. Let's not encourage trespassing. Katr67 (talk) 06:03, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
100% agreed. In the case of Sunken Village, however, there have been legitimate archaeological digs that have recovered artifacts. A photo of one or more those artifacts would be a fine illustration for this article. Ipoellet (talk) 20:25, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Excellent idea. Do you know where they are? Oregon Historical Society or ??? Katr67 (talk) 20:35, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
I don't. OHS would be a good place to start. I have also seen such photos published in a newsletter by the SHPO. Those specific images were non-free for Wikipedia purposes, but they might provide a lead on how to get acceptably licensed pics. Ipoellet (talk) 20:50, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Refs for expansion

Katr67 (talk) 17:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Oops!

Sorry to have been so clumsy with what should have been a simple addition (I guess I got lost trying to understand the citation template! hope I did that right at least....) —Martha (talk) 02:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

i just added more to the reference. nice addition to the article, thanks. doncram (talk) 22:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC)