Talk:Summer Bishil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group. | ||
[edit] Previous Non-notability
haha I started this page in 2005 and it was immediately deleted...see i know best!! the editors told me "she is not notable" and now they restarted the article...i knew before you all!!
Summer Bishil
Non notable. She's 17. She's appeared on one soap opera. Come on. Not notable in the least. Woohookitty(cat scratches) 05:05, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
* Delete per nom. Couldn't this have been speedied? TheRingess 05:07, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
o Nope, because the original version referred to notable roles, which is an obvious claim of notability. Disputed claims must go to AFD. --Rob 05:48, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
* Delete. Non-notable for now. — TheKMantalk 05:09, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
* Delete vanity. Dbtfz 05:21, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
* Delete as non-notable biography. I don't think age is relevant, but I agree that one or two unnamed uncredited soap opera appearances is nothign. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-17 05:25Z
* Delete. MAN SHE'S HOT!!!. Not notable though. :( —gorgan_almighty 15:20, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
* Comment. This is probably ad spam by the agency that employs her. Should probably keep an eye on the user who created the article. —gorgan_almighty 15:24, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
o Everything is possible, but one should be cautious about such a charge. The user you accused, tried, unsuccesfully to upload an image they took from imdb. Now, her agency has a good quality image of her, which they could easily have used, and would wish to use. They wouldn't need to take one from imdb (who have protection that causes the resulting image to be corrupt, see Image:Summer.gif). After all, its probably the agency that supplied imdb. If the agency "got it right" for imdb, they would get it right here. We can and should delete things that don't qualify, without ascribing motives. --Rob 17:45, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
* Delete per nom. Closing admin, don't forget to delete the picture too. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:33, 17 January 2006 (UTC) * Delete per above. Stifle 14:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
[edit] Response
(Sub-sectioned for clarity's sake)
- Doesn't that simply mean she is notable only now? Just because she is found attractive prior to notability doesn't mean she /will/ become notable. --LeyteWolfer 13:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Wow that's really funny. From a non-notable to oscar predictions in one year!! I feel bad for the person who started this article originally...he/she was right to begin with as he/she said haha :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.181.168 (talk) 14:31, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
