Talk:Suit combinations - K10 missing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Contract bridge, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to bridge on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Started with this class of suit combinations as some sort of trial. Want to establish the right level of detail and level of completeness of these tables. E.g. do we want to incorporate suit combinations with an '8' instead of an 'x' if it only makes a slight difference in POS? Perhaps not. JocK 21:54, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

I'd say, they should be included only if presence of 8 or whatever affects the play. Duja 13:31, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi there, there's an error in one of the tables - the combination is missing - I can't correct it as I don't know what the combination being explained is (and I don't want to guess). Care to fix it? Cambion 12:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

• Please note: Wikipedia:Verifiability says that attribution is required for direct quotes and for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged. Any material that is challenged and for which no source is provided may be removed by any editor. Since the tables are uncited and have been so for some time I have removed them.Abtract 15:45, 21 July 2007 (UTC)