Talk:Suit combination - J missing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Contract bridge, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to bridge on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

[edit] original research

There are no citations in this article which seems to have arrived out of thin air - but may have been the product of an editor using a computer program to create supposedly best plays. Abtract 17:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

See discussion at Talk:Suit combinations. JocK 23:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
I have removed the tables as no citations have appeared after 2 months. Abtract 12:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Don't you think it makes the article incredibly weak after it had been dead useful? I personally feel a computer program is ok to use and that we never satisfactorily solved the issue. Can we not get some higher authority (if one exists) to give us some advice and then all just follow it? I'm too busy right now to do much stuff though Cambion 15:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Indeed, incredibly weak. Obviously the work of an non-OR fundamentalist. The official Wikipedia policy states: Not all information added to Wikipedia has to be from peer-reviewed journals, but please strive to make sure that information is reliable and verifiable. The information that was captured in the tables was reliable and verifiable: anyone who understands the fundamentals of suit combinations can verify that the information that was captured in the tables was correct. The problem is that not every wikipedia editor is equiped with this understanding. I have rescued the main article Suit combinations from repeated non-OR attacks by the same non-OR fundamentalist, but don't have the time (nor the energy) to continue doing so for all other suit combination articles. JocK 20:36, 21 July 2007 (UTC)