Talk:Subject matter in South Park

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Subject matter in South Park is part of WikiProject South Park, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia articles related to South Park. If you wish to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-Importance on the importance scale.


"South Park has attempted to cover and satirize a large number of topics "

HAS ATTEMPED ???? What kind of moron wrote that ? It seems some retarded has attempted to belittle SP ?


[edit] Merge

As no one has commented on the reason for a need of merging this article into South Park, and as this article is big enough to be a lone article, I am removing the merge tag.Bballoakie 20:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Abortion

The abortion section states that the "Pro-Choice vs. Cartman" thing seems to promote pro-choice, but I'm pretty sure there was also a "Gun Control vs. Cartman" there. And aren't Trey and Matt against gun restrictions? In other words, I think that debate list was more humorous than trying to send a message. I guess this would mean the show hints towards a pro-life message, although I'm just saying that from what's shown in the article. (I've always seen it as more neutral.) --Jopasopa (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Stem Cells/Cartmen

"It is revealed at the end of the episode he really wanted to use stem cells to clone his favorite pizza restaurant. Since Cartman is generally portrayed as a malevolent person, this can be seen as promoting pro-life." I think this sentence should be omitted. Nothing in the episode suggested that Cartman was either Pro-Life or Pro-Choice. In fact, in this and many other episodes, Cartman does not do things for the sake of others, but only for himself. That part where it was shown that Cartman had made a pizza restaurant was implemented purely for entertainment's sake and I honestly doubt there was any political or scientific undertone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.168.7.217 (talk) 08:15, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

  • I disagree. The episode trying to make a point that a good deal of pro-stem cell and pro-choicers take those positions out of personal selfishness than a genuine concern for others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.151.55.78 (talk) 00:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC)