User talk:Stu-Rat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Stu-Rat! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! --
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

Also, be sure to sign all your Talk posts with four tildes (~~~~). - Zepheus 21:16, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gaunt's Ghosts

Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. See Wikipedia:Assume good faith for the guidelines on this. --Pak21 14:59, 4 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Demolition Man (film)

I invite you to use the talkpage to discuss this issue. I have further, in the interest of all editors involved, placed a {{Content}} tag just before the section you have disputed as unneeded. I disagree.

As I've stated before, admittedly to tersely, the item in question seems to be of doubious nature. As such, owning an early copy of the movie I played it. The name (Scott Peterson) does appear, but has less than a few seconds of screen time. Therefore, only person(s) with VCR or DVR or other forms of video playback, may be able to see and re-verify this item of trivia.

Continuing, as such, sufficient material is made available so that persons may be able to find the relative place of the "screen shot". Giving a time mark is not accurate, as different systems use different temporal methods. A longer description will be "unneeded", as you assert is such now.

If you have a suggestion, or other means by which the trivia may be easily identified by a casual viewer of the movie, I am open to such ideas and am ready to research and make available such information. Until then I ask that the section, as such, remain - including a tag to make your concerns apparent.

This statment copied in whole to Talk:Demolition_Man_(film).

--meatclerk 18:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Quite apparent is our differnce of opinion. I invite you, again, to use the talkpage to discuss this issue. I also remind you that a discussion involves the exchange of ideas. As such, I have retagged the section {{Content}}. I will leave this in place until you respond. Should you decide that you would NOT like to discuss this I may suggest you try, Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal.

BTW, you did not delete the information below. The logs do not lie. Consistency would serve you well.

This statment copied in whole to Talk:Demolition_Man_(film).

Best regards. --meatclerk 06:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Demolition Man (film) Dispute

Hi. I'm interested in working with you and meatclerk to resolve the debate over the Scott Peterson trivia bit in order to focus more on improving the rest of the article to FA status. It seems to me (from what I've read) that you oppose the inclusion of the factoid. Please correct me if I am mistaken. You may leave messages here, on my talkpage (left arrow in my sig) or on the article's talk page. Have a great day! Bobby 20:30, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Demolition Man (film)

Thanks for cutting the trivia on Halo. I was not sure how to do it. You have my support on this cut. --meatclerk 22:49, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Original research and unreferenced claims

Hi, please do not add original research or unreferenced information to Tomorrow Never Dies. All information that is added must be accompanied by a reliable source. Thank you, Localzuk(talk) 16:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. You are making assumptions based on what you saw - you can state that they died in the way you state but you can't draw comparison between their surnames and their deaths - unless you have a source for this. Please read WP:OR. Also, the section has too much trivia in it, it should be worked into the rest of the article per WP:TRIVIA and WP:AVTRIV. Also, do not revert war - I am opposing your additions and removals on the article, you should not simply revert - instead you should explain your reasoning on the talk page.-Localzuk(talk) 20:57, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Transformers

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Alientraveller 11:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I've seen the film, there is a map, it's his ancestor's glasses. Now stop ruining the lead, which summarises the whole article. Glasses = map. If you have further problems, go to the talk page, because the summary is absolutely fine. Otherwise, it is incomplete. The article passed GA with the same lead. Alientraveller 11:56, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for the intermission, but I had to say that I watched the movie and saw a scene where Optimus projects a 3-D hologram of the Earth through the glasses. The imagem was just a projection of the holographic information in the glasses. You can call this a map.
And, am I wrong or the autobots refer to the glasses has a "map" at least once while Sam search for them in his house? wildie·wild dice·will die 12:15, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
OK, I'm putting this discussion in the the talk page of the movie. wildie·wild dice·will die 12:19, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Original research

Please don't add your own criticisms to Invaders from Mars (Doctor Who audio). Doing so violates Wikipedia's policy on original research. If you can point to a reliable source describing the errors in the script, they can be included; otherwise, we have to stick to objective fact. In this case, a reliable source might be a review in Doctor Who Magazine or SFX, or Big Finish's own behind-the-scenes book on the audio adventures (which, as I recall, addresses some of these errors). —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 18:49, 9 August 2007 (UTC)