Talk:Studio
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article covers subjects of relevance to Architecture. To participate, visit the WikiProject Architecture for more information. The current monthly improvement drive is Johannes Itten. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
Is there any reason this article shouldn't be mostly axed and replaced by a simply disambiguation page conforming to MoS:DP? Tedernst 05:26, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
- Because it isn't a disambiguation page, there is no ambiguity to solve, rather it is following Wikipedia:Summary style. For other examples see Time. All the topics on this page are related, it serves readers looking to explore the subject. Since all forms of studio grew from the same root it makes no sense, to me, to disambiguate. Is there any reason a reader would come here and be confused or not find what they were looking for? Is there any ambiguity? I agree the article could be better written, but I don't think that is best served by slashing the text away. Hiding talk 08:05, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
-
- Yes, that's a reason. I thought there must be one that I simply wasn't seeing. The abiguity I was seeing (and still am) was between the different types of studions, that mostly have their own articles. No worries. I'll drop it here. Tedernst 08:26, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
WIZARD REPORT [STUDIO 10 ARCADIA]: ... asked how long computer games take - 7 answers yahoo then removed with violate-elektra - (beware burning avaris) -- surmised that computer games are at a studio 10 level --- studio 10 centaur computer games {NP REVOLUTION}... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.212.12 (talk) 12:02, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
