Talk:Student Congress
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Example
This article ought to be modeled after the Extemporaneous speaking article, which is quite well done.
[edit] Word choice
Because there are so many different venues for Congressional Debate, there are a lot of options for terms synonymous with "debaters" in this article:
- debaters
- senators
- representatives
- participants
- students
Also, where I'm from, we don't call speeches Proponency and Opponency, but just old "pro" and "con" or "in affirmation"/"in negation."
Wouldn't it be more encyclopedic to pick one of these terms and use it throughout most of the article? If so, which one?
--Alex S 01:06, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
RE: Word Choice Well first we have to work out not only which local terminology were going to use, but also the difference in terminology between collegiate and high school debates. I suggest the following vocabulary:
- senators, representatives, students, debaters = PARTICIPANTS
* this because it does not specify between house and senate chambers.
- on sidings of speeches, pro/proponetcy = in (the) affirmation, con/opponetcy = in (the) negation.
The Man 01:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] no mention of the constitutions?
each state has it's own parliamentary procedure as laid out by their forensics association constitution, and then theirs the national forensics league constitution. shouldnt there be a mention of them? Rockinbuddy 20:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] more input from different states
Since each state seems to have its own system of Student Congress [such as in MN most of it is just debating the bills, vs in ND most of it is knowing Robert's Rules of Order in Parliamentary Procedure] I think one thing the article could do would be to add in a state-by-state area for student congress being as it varies so much —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.207.203.184 (talk) 21:42, 7 October 2007 (UTC)