User talk:Strangelv/MEproject
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Additions and removals
Strangelv, please feel free to change anything I added last night. I felt too lazy to start a discussion page. Ward20 (talk) 18:21, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Go right ahead and make more changes. By definition, this isn't a solo project. 8) ...And now it's my turn to get some sleep... -- Strangelv (talk) 19:13, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hillenbrand Project?
Laura Hillenbrand, has been about the most open of any notable figure with very severe ME/CFS recently (in the US). We could write her for permission to use her name on the project. I don't think her name carries any baggage about POV, and the mascot could be a horse. Everyone likes a long shot never give up type of story. Ward20 (talk) 18:00, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure about using a living person as a mascot, but you might want to put your idea on the main page. After all, I put the Damn Disease suggestion up there. 8) -- Strangelv (talk) 00:51, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- I saw that and laughed. Hillenbrand would be the figurehead, The horse Seabiscuit might be the mascot, It's a USA thing if you are not from there. Ward20 (talk) 03:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Actually, I'm a near-lifetime resident of North Texas. I just ::::never read the book or saw the movie: Horseracing doesn't appeal that strongly to me. -- Strangelv (talk) 12:57, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- The movie has little to do with the illness, so the link would not be obvious. How about Remember us?
-
-
-
-
-
-
- I'm personally strongly leaning towards Jagra's suggestion of Post-Infectious and simply accept whatever unintended additional scope that brings us -- it ensures we have at least the scope we want to have -- unless GWF can't be non-controversially included as post-infectious.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Could you list your suggestions on the project page? -- Strangelv (talk) 19:51, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
[edit] Organizations
Other language versions of Wikipedia haven't shared our aversion to linking to patient and advocacy groups. Their pages could be a good starting point for obvious ones to consider creating articles for.
- http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronisches_Ersch%C3%B6pfungssyndrom#Weblinks
- http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%85%A2%E6%80%A7%E7%96%B2%E5%8A%B4%E7%97%87%E5%80%99%E7%BE%A4#.E5.A4.96.E9.83.A8.E3.83.AA.E3.83.B3.E3.82.AF
- http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kroniskt_tr%C3%B6tthetssyndrom#Externa_l.C3.A4nkar —Preceding unsigned comment added by Strangelv (talk • contribs) 18:07, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
- I see, however, a long array of notability disputes on the horizon. Perhaps it would be advisable to create articles by country, e.g. ME/CFS in Canada. Guido den Broeder (talk) 09:21, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ugh. Good point, and I need to not notice them burning down huge chunks of the great library or I won't be able to continue meaningfully participating here (again) -- ME/CFS organizations? Maybe then split off as needed by country or international to let groups with potential notability challenges avoid peril? -- Strangelv (talk) 14:24, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Project name ME-CFS
I thought of ME&CFS and ME-CFS. The first one would be my preference, but unfortunately becomes ME%26CFS in a URL, but the second one seems to be OK in a URL. How about it? I'll add it to the list of candidates for consideration. - Tekaphor (talk) 08:34, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Done, plus I added another 2 of similar structure, totalling 4 new suggestions. - Tekaphor (talk) 08:47, 26 April 2008 (UTC)