Talk:Strychnos ignatia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Homeopathy
Homeopathic information about this plant required reliable sourcing for inclusion. Please do not include it without a reliable source. Thanks. PouponOnToast (talk) 22:28, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- I think we all need to get together to discuss what articles should have at least a mention of homeopathic use. Depending on where you live, we all know that countless homeopathic remedies sit on shelves or in medicine cabinets all over the world. Mere mention in an article would not be considered "undue weight" or "conflict of interest". As far as I am concerned I don't think that the indications for use should be mentioned. You won't find many docs who like the idea of people treating themselves based on what they have read online. Especially wikipedia. My official take is I think the "most used" (aka polychrest) remedies should have a brief passage along with their other pharmacologic/biologic/other use. I have no interest in discussing whether or not people think it works or how many controlled trials have been conducted. The simple truth is that people use it, and for that reason alone the information should be mentioned here.--travisthurston+ 02:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)