Talk:Structure of the RAAF

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Portal	Structure of the RAAF is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian military.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: Associated task forces (general topics): Military aviation task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): Australian military history task force

[edit] Table

IN the table of Army equivilents it is missing a Division? eg. Section, Platoon, Company, Battalion, Brigade, DIVISION, Corps, Army etc.

Well the question is where does it fit in?

We know that an Air Force equals an Army, and a Brigade equals a Group. The Air Force only has one formation (Command) between them whislt the Army has two (Corps and Division).

I can't find a definitive answer on the internet - this is open for discussion.

Justinbrett 07:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC)