Talk:Strong programme

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The phrase "the strong programme has four indispensable components comes together" doesn't make sense. Could it be changed to say simply "the strong programme has four indispensable components"? Rwclark 04:49, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

---

I'm not making an edit here, but has scientific positivism been unseated and from what prior authority? And does making such a claim hold to NPOV.

---

I Agree, move to delete? GodHead 01:53, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Deleted. I also expanded the article. Anyone want to take on the criticisms of the strong program?Bryan 13:45, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

---

Bruno Latour should not be confused with the 'strong programme'. He has indeed borrowed from the 'strong programme' but in doing so he has developed an alternative (post-structural) approach toward the study of science and society.

This is correct. See Actor-network theory.Bryan

This article should not be spelt with an Americanised spelling. How do I revert the title of the article to the UK spelling?--Nicholas 12:55, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hard reading . . .

Very difficult to understand. Can't this be simplified for the layperson? Sincerely, GeorgeLouis 07:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Have I understood it?

So they propose that a valid theory is believed to be valid because of social factors? Kind of difficult to support, I'd say... --euyyn 00:36, 19 December 2006 (UTC)