From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
|
| Food and drink task list: |
|
|
|
Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:
- Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Food, Bread, Beef, Curry, Drink, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yoghurt, Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom)
- Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: , Italian cuisine, Cuisine of the Thirteen Colonies, Coffee, Milk, Pasta, French cuisine, Chocolate
- Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Burger King
- Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
- Get rid of Trivia sections in articles you are working on.
- Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner to food and drink related articles to help bring them to members attention. It could encourage new members to the project too.
- Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of food
- Review articles currently up for GA status: Burger King legal issues, Chocolate
- Review articles currently up for FA status: Butter
|
|
|
[edit] Need photo
Need photo of the interior of this fruit. Badagnani 04:38, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Old name vs. new name
ITIS still use Psidium cattleianum as the valid name, stating P. littorale (and others) as being a synonym:
Psidium cattleianum (TSN 27239). Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
What's the real deal here? Tommy Kronkvist talk contribs 08:35, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- ITIS is extremely out of date. I used to work for USGS and names I submitted three years ago still haven't been put up. I'm not completely sure that P. littorale is correct, but I think it is, and the point is that ITIS shouldn't be taken as a source for current taxonomy. KarlM (talk) 19:02, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
