Strawbridge v. Curtiss
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Strawbridge v. Curtiss | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||||||
Argued February 12, 1806 Decided February 13, 1806 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Holding | ||||||||||
A controversy is not "between citizens of different states," so as to give jurisdiction to the federal courts, unless all the persons on one side of it are citizens of different states from all the persons on the other side. | ||||||||||
Court membership | ||||||||||
Chief Justice: John Marshall Associate Justices: William Cushing, William Paterson, Samuel Chase, Bushrod Washington, William Johnson |
||||||||||
Case opinions | ||||||||||
Majority by: Marshall Joined by: unanimous |
||||||||||
Laws applied | ||||||||||
Judiciary Act of 1789 |
Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. 267 (1806)[1], was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States first addressed the question of complete diversity. In a 158 word opinion the court held that for federal diversity jurisdiction under section 11 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, every party on one side must be citizens of a different state. Therefore, when there are joint plaintiffs or defendants, jurisdiction must be established as to each party. This requirement remains in law as a matter of statutory interpretation, not constitutional law.
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- ^ 7 U.S. 267 Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com.