User talk:Stoni

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Non Falo Galego Mais...

Saludos, I would like to know where did you get the picture from the "Voz de Galicia". I want to put one in the "La Vanguardia" article but i'm not sure I can take it from the oficcial newspaper's webpage. Gracias! Adleos 20:12, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Galego over 10000 articles - message to lb

You wrote: "Wikipedia in Galician (Galego) has now more than 10000 articles. Could you please move it?" : Thank you for your message. Will be done soon. Greetings from Luxembourg. lb:User:Cornishong

[edit] Galicia

Hi Stoni,

In case you haven't noticed. Galicia is a disambig. page because if you check out what links there, it's pretty much 50/50 between the region in Spain and the region in Europe that links there. Please stop moving the pages. Thanks. --Hottentot 22:48, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

I haven't checked up the number of pages inside wikipedia. But if you check outside wikipedia you will know why do I do this. I'm sure links inside wikipedia can be corrected --Stoni 22:50, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
Both Wikipedia articles are equally important. As many pages about the Galicia in Central Europe link to Galicia and the one in Spain. --Hottentot 22:54, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
If you check the [relevancy of links to Galicia article and the term Galicia in the Internet you will see that everything is about Spanish Galicia. I am sure that much people can link incorrectly in wikipedia. If you worry about this I can correct this also but will be more easy to correct Central Europe articles because there is no one outside wikipedia. Instead for spanish one you should correct 50% of articles at english wikipedia, all the other wikipedias that use Galicia for Spanish autonomous comunity (24 exactly/compared with 2) and other websites outside wikipedia. --Stoni 23:03, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
I am sorry but aren't equally important. Also Galician wikipedia has more than 10.000 articles. Also your calculus is incorrect, only 10% of articles are about central europe. Perhaps you saw some articles about Germany but it also link to Spanish Galcia --Stoni 23:05, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
Just an example: If you check links to Galicia one is about Karl I of Austria and as Central Europe Galicia is in Austria it should talk about it. But not, it also talks about Spanish Galicia. Perhaps this small Galicia took the name from the Spanish one. I have corrected all links it took me 10 minutes. Thanks, this will improve quality of Wikipedia. --Stoni 23:20, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Stoni, I posted the following on my page re your request for assistance re WikiProject Galica:

I'm off the week after Christmas (yes, a week off!) and I'd be happy to pitch in at that time. Very interesting topic, I must say. One thing, could you send me a reminder around the 24th (I'm kind of like the absent-minded professor). Thanks, and I look forward to getting started. Jim62sch 17:29, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Stop

I never said that you should move Galicia (Spain) to Galicia. It should remain a disambig. page because both meanings are equally important, and it goes according to Wikipedia:Neutral Point of View. Please stop switching instances where is linked to Galicia (Spain) to Galicia --Hottentot 23:50, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

I thought it was enought to you what I told you to reflect biggest importance of Spanish Galicia in a neutral view. I thought it was better to move it because of now the only problem is that 50% of pages go to Galicia and 50% to Galicia (Spain), and 100% are about Spanish Galicia. There were just 6 pages about Austrian Galicia referring to Galicia --Stoni 00:00, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

But check about how many pages link to Galicia (Central Europe) and Galicia (Spain. The number of pages are about the same. --Hottentot 00:04, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
People in Galicia also write in Galician Wikipedia and and Spanish Wikipedia. For that reason there is only 476 articles linking to iberian Galicia compared to 425 about Central Europe. Also 90% of the links to Galicia were about iberian/spanish/the kingdom of Galicia. There are also other historic reasons that I think you don't care about. --Stoni 00:00, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
You just said the reason why Galicia should remain a disambig page. 425 link to the Central European region, and 476 articles link to the iberian Galicia article. Those numbers are close. --Hottentot 00:42, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Kingdom of Galicia

An Award
Very good Stoni! I've just seen what you have done with Kingdom of Galicia and Portugal, Kingdom of Galicia, Gallaecia, History of Galicia and the History of Galicia box series. My deepest congratulations. I was going to propose that something along those lines should be done, but you were ahead of me the whole time. For your work in bringing up the quality of Galician articles I award you the Barnstar of National Merit. The Ogre 17:25, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Galician portal

Thanks for the invitation. I'm from Argentina, currently at Madrid. My grandfather was a (true) gayego from Pontevedra Province, and I was always fond of my heritage. I'll try to contribute, nut don't expect a lot from me :-) Saúdos, User:Ejrrjs says What? 15:04, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Grazas pola mensaxe, o meu inglés non é moi bo, podo entendelo pero xa escribir artigos longos e outra cuestión, si fixen hai tempo un artigo sobre un concello galego: Abadín, Lugo, podo facer cousas dese estilo, o que si me parece moi interesante é o do portal sobre Galicia, axudará a dar a coñecer ao noso país no mundo anglosaxón, felicitacións pola iniciativa, saúdos.--Rocastelo 15:05, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the invitation. I'll try to do my best. Jfreyre

Hey there. I'm quite new here, I'm actually working on some new articles for the english wikipedia about benposta and their circus and founder, I'm afraid that'll take a lot. User:OPeixe

  • Please if you are interested put your name at participants list. --Stoni(talk) 14:18, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Galicia

Y digo yo....siendo tú español...y siendo yo español...¿¿no sería más cómodo hablar en español?? En fin...mi inglés es el de un alumno de 3º de ESO un poco aventajado, así que poco podré hacer, de todas formas gracias por la invitación. Reignerok 17:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Yo soy brasileño y mi español es muy malo. Porque pensas que puedo ajudar en WikiProyecto de Galiza? No entiendo nada de lá. Pero, onde puder ajudar, yo ajudo. Solo me diga aonde. --Slade | PT 18:02, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] History of Celtic Gaelleica

Hi Stoni, i've been working on The Celtic History of Galicia, as you can see on the article "History of Galicia", I'm still working on the Roman Period (I'm working on some maps and images, and I'm tryng to expand the article) but I need your help, the article it's too long and we'll have to split it on some subarticles, but I don't know how to do it... mainly 'cause i'm just a newbie ;)

And last but not least, I want to work with you in all Historical Items in the Galician project.

My best Regards.

20:59, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you for the news!

Thank you. I will communicate the new to the other representative users in our wikipedia. --Agremon 10:48, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Featured article

Just to inform you that an article you've edited before (History of Portugal (1777-1834)) is nominated for featured article. If you want you can vote or comment here. Thanks. Gameiro 04:56, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Ignacio_Ramonet.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ignacio_Ramonet.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 06:43, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:Vigo Flag.gif

An image that you uploaded, Image:Vigo Flag.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Jesse Viviano 23:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

I noticed that the source web page had a copyright notice on it, so I do not believe that this is public domain. Jesse Viviano 23:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Anxo Quintana.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Anxo Quintana.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 03:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:La Opinión A Coruña Front.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:La Opinión A Coruña Front.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Álvaro_Cunqueiro.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Álvaro_Cunqueiro.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Butseriouslyfolks 04:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Pescanova_logo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Pescanova_logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 20:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for commons:Image:Benito Jerónimo Feijoo.jpg

Thanks for uploading commons:Image:Benito Jerónimo Feijoo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Conscious 07:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)