Talk:Stormwatch: Team Achilles

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. Please rate the article and provide comments here.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (publisher): DC Comics work group

The president of the US in the Wildstorm U was named, in issue 14 it calls him Patrick Kent, so I changed that. Jjmckool (talk) 01:46, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Didn't Emoticon show up in Eye of the Storm Annual as well, housed in a Daemonite-like bio-android? As I recall, he faced off against Grifter --Strannik 03:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Original research

There is an awful lot of unsourced statements in the controversy/cancellation sections (which were dropped in by an anon user []) which does a lot of finger pointing but completely fails to mention the main controversy over Micah Wright himself and why this was shut early with no sign of the third trade. In addition it is largely unnecessary and is a much broader issue about the mature line (here an elsewhere) - the previous (April 29, 2007) version is more succinct and does the job well. I'd be tempted to yank the lot and possibly work up a short paragraph with information that we can actually source. (Emperor 20:02, 8 October 2007 (UTC))

It reads like a bad essay. According to the Stormwatch page it was cancelled as Wildstorm found out he had lied about being in the marines. There's nothing here about that, so one of the pages is missing sometihng.

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:SWTA.jpg

Image:SWTA.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)