Talk:Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C. is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do.
Article milestones Date Process Result December 28, 2007 Peer review Reviewed January 24, 2008 Featured article candidate Promoted Current Status: Featured article

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject on Football     (Rated FA-Class) Association football Portal The article on Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C. is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ. FA This article has been rated as FA-Class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by the WikiProject on non-League football. WikiProject Sheffield This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sheffield, a WikiProject which aims to improve Sheffield related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. WikiProject Yorkshire     (Rated FA-Class) Yorkshire Portal Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C. is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page. FA This article has been rated as FA-Class on the Project's assessment scale. Please provide a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. Low This article has been rated as Low-Priority on the Project's priority scale.

[edit] Stocksbridge (talk · contribs)

Wow, fab work by Stocksbridge. Is it worth separating the info on the ground out into a separate article? L.J.Skinner^{wot|I did} 22:39, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Coordinates and {{SheffieldStructures}} template

Can I ask Stocksbridge why s/he removed the above? If no explanation is given, I shall revert as I think they add to the article by showing where the ground is, and also link to other Sheffield and Sport in Sheffield articles. L.J.Skinner^{wot|I did} 17:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Comments from my review at FAC

A few comments before I feel I can support 100%.

• Not overwhelmed by the opening single-sentence paragraph. Could merge with some info from the following para to make the flow more even.
  • I've just merged the two paragraphs - what do you think?
• "rounds proper" - I know what this is but a non-expert may have problems.
  • changed
• "...the premier competition ..." says who? Is it really the premier cup competition? Still a bit peacock.
  • changed - what do you think?
• "it is thus..." - bit Shakespearian for me!
  • junked
• "The average figure was exactly the same as ..." - don't really need exactly, and besides, it's probably only exactly to the nearest whole number, right?
  • junked
• I think I've mentioned it once before but consider uploading free use images (e.g. the ones you created) to Commons rather than Wikipedia. It's really not too hard and it's better for everyone.
  • I'll look into this, but this houldn't affect the FAC-or-otherwise qaulity of this article, should it......?
• League position graph could do with further annotation, maybe to state which leagues each pair of yellow lines delineate, and maybe even a numbered y-axis to give context as to how high up the "non-league" ladder the whole graph is.
  • aaarrrgggghhhhhhhh - it took me all weekend to create that graph, please don't make me re-do it!!!!!!!!!
    • But seriously, I will see what my completely minimal skills with the package I used to create that can do when I'm back on my home PC.....
• "a step three division" - what does this mean?
  • changed
• "the fee when Lee Mills was..." don't think you need to repeat "the fee" here.
  • junked
• I tend to find the U-18 managers/physio etc as trivial. I'd prefer you have the manager/assistant manager somewhere in the text along with the club director(s) and axe the remainder.
  • I've taken a different approach and written a little bit of prose, as opposed to bullet points, mentioning the key men. Do you think this works better.......?

Feel free to respond here or to me directly according to your feelings! The Rambling Man (talk) 10:31, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

• Thanks for your comments! ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:16, 7 January 2008 (UTC)