Stolen Valor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article has been nominated to be checked for its neutrality. Discussion of this nomination can be found on the talk page. (November 2007)

For the U.S. law, see Stolen Valor Act of 2005.

Stolen Valor: How the Vietnam Generation Was Robbed of its Heroes and its History
Author	B.G. Burkett and Glenna Whitley
Cover artist	Mark McGarry
Country	US
Language	English
Publisher	Verity Press, INC., Dallas, TX.
Publication date	1998
Media type	Hardcover Paperback
Pages	692 pages
ISBN	ISBN 0-96670-360-x

Stolen Valor: How the Vietnam Generation Was Robbed of its Heroes and its History is a self-published book by B.G. Burkett & Glenna Whitley which asserts that there is a false popular view of [Vietnam War]] veterans as broken men and pyschopaths. In addition the book purports to document "wannabes": people lying about Viet Nam experience, often when they had never been there. B.G. Burkett is a Vietnam War Veteran who served with the 199th Light Infantry Brigade as a company grade officer. Glenna Whitley is an investigative journalist who writes about crime and the legal system. The book has endnotes and an index; the hardcover edition is 692 pages.

[edit] Contents

Stolen Valor is divided into 5 parts.

Part I (The Image) begins with a chapter about B.G. Burkett's time in the Army. The next four chapters detail the author's argument that the image of the Vietnam Veteran was tarnished by a combination of media coverage, Veteran imposters, US citizens' anger against the draft, and a perceived conception of the veteran as a victim.^[1]

Part II (The Trauma of War) looks into the diagnoses of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in Vietnam Veterans and how it is treated by the Veteran's Administration and the rise of war atrocity accusations against Vietnam Veterans. It also does further analysis of the effects of people, the author believes to be Vietnam War Veteran imposters, on the image of the Vietnam Veteran, specifically, the lack of investigation by the news media into the background of these possible veterans. This part delves into what the author believes to be the mislabelling of one of the causes of homelessness, the Vietnam War.^[2]

Part III (Stolen Valor) describes what the author believes to be a widespread wearing of Vietnam War specific medals, ribbons and badges by people who did not earn them. The author, using the Freedom of Information Act, was able to retrieve records of individuals who claimed they served in Vietnam during the War and he used this method to denounce people who didn't have records to support their service, badges, ribbons and medals. In this section, the author also demonstrates his disbelief in the idea that minorities participated in rates higher then their percentage of the populations. ^[3]

In Part IV (Victims and Heroes) , the author discusses what he believes to be a myth about the effects of Agent Orange, profiling pilots from the Vietnam War who flew Agent Orange delivery missions in Vietnam and who have not had an increase in health effects since then. In this section, the author also denounces the Vietnam Veterans of America, calling them "Vietnam Victims of America."^[4]

Part V (Appendices) provides lists of Medal of Honor awardees, Distinguished Service Cross awardees, Navy Cross awardees, Air Force Cross Awardees and U.S. military POWs who survived their captivity.

[edit] Reception

Mackubin Thomas Owens, an adjunct fellow at the Ashbrook Center, a professor of strategy and force planning at the Naval War College in Newport, R.I., and and a Marine infantry veteran of Vietnam, praised Burkett as finding imposters by doing "something that any reporter worth his or her salt could have done: he used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to check the actual records of the 'image makers' used by reporters to flesh out their stories on homelessness, Agent Orange, suicide, drug abuse, criminality, or alcoholism." ^[5]

Vietnam veteran Dave Curry, in a review published by one of the organizations criticized in the book, Vietnam Veterans Against the War, accused Burkett and his coauthor of displaying political partisanship, making "errors in research methodology," making misleading statements about Winter Soldier Investigation participants, and denigrating the experiences and motives of veterans who subsequently opposed the war .^[6]

[edit] References