Talk:Stigma (letter)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chinese character "Book" This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project’s quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the Project’s importance scale.
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Greece, an attempt to expand, improve and standardize the content and structure of articles related to Greece.
If you would like to participate, you can improve Stigma (letter), or sign up and contribute in a wider array of articles like those on our to do list. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (comments)
High This article has been rated as a High priority article

Contents

[edit] Pronunciation

How is stigma pronounced?

st

probably... Wikisquared 10:31, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Photograph

The first letter of the word in the photo looks like an elision of sigma and tau. It looks nothing like the "stigma" character discussed in the main article: such an elision could have been done by someone who'd never seen a stigma. Is this really a good example? Dark Formal 21:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


The legend for the photograph should make explicity which Byzantine period the writing sample is from. It may be confusing to those who just know that Byzantine means complex and old, and then to read that "stigma" (did the Greeks themselves call it that? does it have anything to do with the english word?) did not exist until Medieval times (which people associate with ideas of unfairness and crude thought, not oldness per se).

[edit] Title of article

Why is this article called "Stigma (letter)", when Stigma is not in fact a "letter" according to ordinary definitions of the word (but rather is a ligature)? The name used on the Unicode character list doesn't really count for much by itself... AnonMoos (talk) 15:52, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Agreed, the article title is confusing. PeterMottola (talk) 04:40, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

The article calls it a ligature, and the manuscript example looks like a ligature, but in the article the character itself looks nothing like a ligature of sigma and tau, at least on my browser. It just looks like a word-final sigma. Is it rendered correctly? Dark Formal (talk) 15:21, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Template

Why is this not listed in the template? —DIV (128.250.80.15 (talk) 06:35, 15 April 2008 (UTC))