User talk:Stewartadcock

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is Stewart's talk page. Feel free to leave a message.

As an administrator, I'm not quite omnipotent, but I can do awesome things like moving and deleting pages, protecting and unprotecting pages, blocking vandals, and so on. If you need any such tasks performed, please feel free to click here or email me and ask. If I haven't responded in a day, or two, you had better ask someone else because I must have gone on holiday, or something.

Archives: [ 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 ]

Contents

[edit] This month's MCB Collaboration of the Month article is Peripheral membrane protein!

Peripheral membrane protein
The Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject's current Collaboration of the Month article is Peripheral membrane protein.
Please help to improve this article to featured article status.
Last month's collaboration was RNA interference.

ClockworkSoul 19:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Tessella_(company)

Hi Stewart. I've did quite a bit of editing to improve Tessella late last year. However, now I wonder whether the company meets wikipedia notability criteria and be should be considered for deletion? Noticed this week that your talk page links to the article so I thought I see if you had a view.

In terms of notability, I can't find any media reports using google. I note too, that it's a small company, comparatively speaking, with turnover around GPB10m per annum. Although it's listed, the notability guidelines say that only a major exchange listing is grounds for inclusion.

CheersSaganaki- 06:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Prusik

Your photos on the Prusik knot page are very well done, however I sure hope you don't use such an arrangement for climbing. Spectra and Dyneema melt at a very low temperature, and should never ever be used in a knot like a Prusik that has the potential to slide (some manufacturers say never tie any knot in it). Also, cord makes much better Prusiks since cord tightens around the rope when it rolls --- since webbing dosn't roll, it loses this advantage. And, enough 6 mm cord to make a pair of Prusiks is not very expensive.⇝CasitoTalk 17:05, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Survey Invitation

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 21:28, 3 March 2007 (UTC)talk to me

[edit] Wikimedia UK

Hi Stewart,

At some point you expressed an interest in supporting Wikimedia UK. We're now ready to begin receiving applications from prospective members. If you would like to join, application forms and further information can be found at: http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/join. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions, either via my user page at the English Wikipedia or by email (andrew.walker@wikimedia.org.uk).

Thanks, Andreww 19:24, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

(Membership officer, Wikimedia UK)

[edit] Please re-register

Hello, Stewartadcock! You are receiving this notice because the Cleanup Taskforce has been inactive, as a result of this all active taskforce members are being asked to re-register.

For more information see: Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce/Not Dead Yet

If you do not re-register here within 15 days of receiving this notice your name will be removed from the membership list (if you were unable to reply to this notice in time, you can just add you name back).

 Tcrow777  talk  04:43, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Climbing Techniques

Hello Stewart, I see that you haven't been active recently so I hope all is well, and that you can reply to this soon. I was hoping that you would consider modifying the Climbing techniques article with some of the revisions you have made on your own page, User:Stewartadcock/Climbing techniques. I think the lead and sectioning could be particularly useful, though I'm sure you will format your technique descriptions differently (probably similarly to the current article?). Anyway, I wanted to hold off before doing anything just in case you had something in mind, but the article doesn't have to be perfect before you make those much needed changes! Thanks for your work on this topic, by the way. WDavis1911 (talk) 21:24, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Answered at User talk:WDavis1911 Stewart Adcock (talk) 11:35, 25 January 2008 (UTC)